Woe to you Canadian government

"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people's bones and all uncleanness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness." Matthew 23:27–28 (ESV): 

On the one hand, the Canadian government marked World Suicide Prevention Day on September 10th. They announced $120.2 million for continued operations of the 988 Suicide Crisis Helpline:

On World Suicide Prevention Day, we renew our commitment to preventing suicide, to supporting people who may be struggling, and to creating spaces for open, compassionate conversations that can help save lives.

Every person deserves to know that they matter, that they are valued, and that support is available. The 9-8-8: Suicide Crisis Helpline provides a safe, bilingual, trauma-informed and culturally sensitive space for anyone seeking support for themselves or for someone they know. Since launching in November 2023, trained 9-8-8 responders have answered more than one million calls and text messages.

Earlier this year, I announced renewed support of up to $120.2 million over the next two years for the continued operations of 9-8-8. This investment reflects our ongoing commitment to ensure that people across Canada have access to suicide prevention support when they need it the most.

On the other hand, the Canadian government has the most permissive euthanasia (MAID) regime in the entire world.

We don't want you to kill yourself -- but we do want a doctor to kill you.

Mark Carney needs to fix removing God from prayer

From: Patricia Maloney

Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 6:27 PM
Subject: Decision to remove God and prayer
To: <mark.carney@parl.gc.ca>, Prime Minister/Premier ministre <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: <bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>, <ginette.petitpastaylor@parl.gc.ca>, Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, <Stefanie.Beck@forces.gc.ca>, Patricia Maloney <maloneyp64@gmail.com>, <mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca>, <information@forces.gc.ca>

Dear Mark Carney,

Please find attached, a statement by Bishop Scott McCaig, C.C. Military Ordinary of Canada regarding the new policy that states:

“In military settings, spiritual reflections are inclusive public addresses to a group of individuals that nurture resilience by fostering meaning, purpose, and spiritual well-being,” Furthermore, “Spiritual reflections do not use religious specific language, including references to God, etc.” 

This is an unconscionable decision. You are a practicing Catholic I understand. This has happened under your watch. You need to fix it. And please do not pass my concerns off to one of your ministers like you did the last time I wrote to you. The buck stops with you. You have the power to correct this situation and you must do so. You serve the people of Canada.

To arbitrarily change the role of the Military Ordinariate of Canada to remove God and prayer--a role that has existed as an official canonical jurisdiction for 75 years, tracing its roots back to a military vicariate established in 1951; then in1939: Catholic military bishops first began serving the Canadian Army during the Second World War; then in February 17, 1951, formally erected as the Military Vicariate of Canada by Pope Pius XII July 21; in 1986: Elevated and promoted to the status of a full Military Ordinariate by the Vatican--is simply a terrible decision.

As a Catholic and a Canadian, I am ashamed that this is happening. It is an insult to God whose power far exceeds your own.

I hope you decide to do the right thing and reverse this decision as soon as possible.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Patricia Maloney

Ottawa

$1,272,679 spent to help you to be an "ally" to 2SLGBTQI+

I did an ATIP to find out just how much of our tax dollars went to the the Unity Campaign courtesy of the Department for Women and Gender Equality (WAGE). 

What is the Unity campaign? I am so glad you asked:

The Unity campaign sets out to create a more inclusive future for everyone, including Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, and other sexually and gender diverse (2SLGBTQI+) people.

Help advance equality by recognizing stigma, debunking misinformation, and supporting 2SLGBTQI+ communities.

WAGE spent at least $1,272,679.28 on the campaign. I say at least, because of the other internal costs buried in the department's day to day operations, like salaries of employees, other professional services contracts, etc. :

The contracts identified were awarded specifically for activities related to the Unity campaign, including services such as marketing, communications, and video production. The department also made use of existing department-wide communications and professional services contracts that supported a range of departmental priorities and initiatives. Expenditures under these broader contractual vehicles were not tracked or coded exclusively to the Unity campaign, and consequently the department cannot accurately determine the proportion of those contract values that supported the campaign. Accordingly, the contract values disclosed represent only those contracts directly attributable to the Unity campaign and may not reflect all expenditures incurred in support of the initiative.

Salary expenditures are not specifically tracked for this initiative, as employees support multiple departmental programs, projects, priorities and operational activities as part of their regular responsibilities.

The contracts went to:

P2400057 Cossette Communication Inc. for $988,156.83

P2500116 Essencemediacom Canada ULC $96,570.97

P2600035 Essencemediacom Canada ULC $132,796.48

P2600037 M5 Marketing Communications Inc. $51,030

P2700019 Essencemediacom Canada ULC $4,125

 

• P2400057: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/record/wage%2CC-2023-2024-Q2-00004
• P2500116: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/record/wage%2CC-2024-2025-Q3-00014
• P2600035: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/record/wage%2CC-2025-2026-Q2-00005
• P2600037: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/record/wage%2CC-2025-2026-Q2-00007
• P2700019: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/record/wage%2CC-2026-2027-Q1-00010

Here are the videos that were produced with your tax dollars for this campaign. I count six of them.

https://www.canada.ca/en/women-gender-equality/campaigns/unity/stories.html

https://www.canada.ca/en/women-gender-equality/campaigns/unity/resources.html

Dying with Dignity: Advert aimed at dementia patients disguised as learning

Here we have Dying with Dignity presenting their death wares (MAID) to people with Dementia and their families in Nova Scotia on September 20th. Really? If people have dementia, is it really appropriate and or ethical to be talking to them about medical homicide? 

This is beyond disgusting.

People with limited imaginations: abortion and euthanasia

Catholic social teaching on abortion and euthanasia is pretty straightforward. 

Below are excerpts from a short 16 page booklet by Fr. Larry Lynn. 

The Church teaches that there are four pillars of Catholic Social teachings: Dignity of the Human Person, Solidarity, Subsidiarity and the Common Good. The Church's opposition to certain practices that our modern society deems normal or even good, is based on these fundamental pillars of Catholic teaching. The governments say people have a "right" to abortion or that our medical system should promote and, with our tax dollars, use doctors and nurses to kill innocent human life through euthanasia.

Dignity

People with limited imaginations believe that the child growing in the womb of its mother is not really human. They dismiss the dignity of that person in the womb because an embryo or a fetus, or a child, has no power. They believe dignity depends on some attribute or another, like size, viability, ability to communicate or have some other sign of usefulness. The entire euthanasia industry in Canada comes down to the usefulness of a person compared to the cost effectiveness of caring for someone deemed "not useful".

Solidarity

In dignity, all people are equal, no matter what attributes, abilities, assets or skills they may have, or circumstances they may be in, we are all called to respect the dignity.

Subsidiarity

Under the Principle of Subsidiarity, no higher level of organization has the right to take over the responsibilities that are due to the lower level of organization, i.e. the federal government cannot usurp the duties and responsibilities of the provincial government. The public school system has no right to interfere with the parenting of children.

The Common Good

In our world, there are governments, laws, policies and public institutions that promote abortion, euthanasia, contraception, torture, pornography, surrogate parenting, in vitro fertilization, body mutilation, capital punishment, restrictions on freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly and travel. "These things are detrimental to authentic human fulfillment and flourishing" and therefore, do not contribute to the common good but in fact destroy dignity, solidarity and subsidiarity which are necessary for the common good.

You can access the booklet here: Catholic Social Justice Teachings: A Primer Fr. Larry Lynn Priests for Life Canada (PFLC Board Member and Chaplain for Pro-life diocese in Vancouver)

All Catholic parishes and schools would greatly benefit from this booklet.

The euthanasia industry advertises killing people

Kelsi Sheren recently reported how Dying with Dignity is ADVERTISING death on META. Dying with Dignity spends a LOT of money on advertising: $1,013,240 in 2025 in only one year alone. A million dollars. To promote euthanasia. To the sick and vulnerable.

Here is another advertisement from the same pro-death cult -- an ad in Macleans magazine entitled End of Life: Have You Had the Talk? Because you know, you better have that talk. Yes siree. You don't want your old parents to die before you've had the talk. You know the one. Where you say to them:

What about euthanasia? Have you thought about that? Because then we can get our hands on your inheritance a bit early, before you kick off naturally. We won't have to watch you drool into your soup or change your diapers or any of those disgusting things. You'll just drift off into oblivion, maybe drown a bit first, but hey that's a small price to pay for leaving planet earth early, don't you think? Come on Dad you can do it, we will even help you do it. How's next weekend. Does that work for you?

I also came across an article in the Kanata Community Voice newspaper entitled A feeling of being more in control. Notice the words the pro-deathers use. Euthanasia sounds so positive, so comforting, so soothing and lovely. This presentation by the pro-deathers actually reads like an advert (though I'm pretty sure DWDC didn't pay anything to present it). And it was given to a bunch of old people. I emailed the author of this piece, Nevil Hunt, and asked three questions (see below). He never replied. Hunt paints a glowing picture of MAID, with nothing at all about the many horror stories we have heard to date about this horrific medical homicide.

Dear Nevil,

I read this article from your June 25th newsletter.

I have a couple of comments and questions for you.

1) You state that "a natural death must be foreseeable". However this is not the case with track 2 MAID. In this case a person whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable is also eligible.

2) Your write-up has an example of someone who seemingly had a positive experience with MAID. Did you know that there are numerous people who have had horrific experiences with MAID? See here for just some of these cases.

https://alexschadenberg.blogspot.com/2026/06/euthanasia-complications-challenge-good.html?m=1

Can you tell me if any such negative experiences were identified to the audience in this presentation? Hopefully this was discussed with the seniors in the audience, many of whom may not be aware of the problems with MAID.

3) Dr Joel Zivot testified in Senate hearings on MAID. You might be interested to read his story here

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/unchartedterritory/91214

He concludes his article with this: 

"Canadians who choose to die by MAiD must be informed of the real possibility that the death they experience may be very different from that which is described by MAiD advocates. It is time to perform autopsies on everyone that dies by MAiD, so we can determine if MAiD protocols produce frothy fluid in the lungs. It is time to cease the use of paralytics in MAiD, so we can be certain we are not covering the potential for a painful death akin to drowning. It is time to accept what the evidence available to date shows: MAiD may very likely provide a torturous death."

Dying with Dignity has attempted to refute Dr Zivot's testimony. Please read the doctor's information and testimony yourself and make up your own mind. DWDC is a very lucrative charity and MAID is their product. They have millions in long term assets ($8,160,832) and bring in millions in donations every year. $2,276,570 in 2025 alone. 

https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/hacc/srch/pub/dsplyRprtngPrd/118890086RR0001

They are not happy when people raise serious issues with the reality of MAID. It is not the wonderful peaceful experience Dying with Dignity would have you believe. At the very least, you owe it to the seniors who attended the presentation, and to your readers, to let them know about the very real and very dark side of MAID.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Patricia Maloney

Government of Canada buys into misinformation about Crisis Pregnancy Centres

According to a recent ATIP I did, the government of Canada says that Crisis Pregnancy Centres:

disseminate abortion myths to pregnant individuals in crisis...Research by XXXXXX (probably Joyce Arthur) and colleagues of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (2023) has consistently found that in presenting information, these groups fail to explicitly disclose their religious agenda and anti-abortion sentiments. CPCs spread false medical information...

For the record, I and others have consistently found that ARCC's reports are full of misinformation and disinformation. (see links below for these rebuttals)

My ATIP to Health Canada:

"What evidence does the Public Health Agency have to issue a warning that "Crisis pregnancy centres ... often look like clinics or support centres, but they are designed to discourage people from getting an abortion"? Also please provide me with your evidence that Crisis pregnancy centres "are designed to discourage people from getting an abortion" (emphasis added)

The government of Canada has also posted statements on their official websites based on these untruths.

From Health Canada's website:

Crisis pregnancy centres

Crisis pregnancy centres are usually run by anti-abortion organizations. They often look like clinics or support centres, but they are designed to discourage people from getting an abortion. (emphasis added)

From the department of Finance we have this statement:

concerns have been raised that some registered charities that offer reproductive health services to women, including pregnancy options counselling—and that are provided federal supports under the tax system—may be spreading misinformation by presenting themselves as a neutral, full-service pregnancy support service organization, when they are in fact anti-choice organizations that push women away from accessing the reproductive care of their choice. By concealing the true nature of their services, these organizations, known as crisis pregnancy centres, are restricting the rights of vulnerable pregnant women to choose the reproductive care appropriate to them and their circumstances...According to the Abortion Rights Coalition, there are about 157 anti-choice crisis pregnancy centres in Canada, of which 90.5 per cent are operated by registered charities. (emphasis added)

My ATIP identifies ARCC's reports that spread myths about Crisis Pregnancy Centres, and all of these reports are used as the government's "evidence" against CPCs. These myths have been refuted many times. Yet still the lies are spread and our Canadian government buys into them. The ATIP also references studies from the United States, based on the American experience of CPCs, which of course have nothing to do with the Canadian experience, so these references can be and should be ignored.

Did the government of Canada make any effort at all to read the reports that refute the mythical allegations of the pro-abortion idealogues? There is not one word in the ATIP that would confirm that they did.

Below are the links the government of Canada has chosen to ignore about Crisis Pregnancy Centres preferring to take the word of the pro-abortions.

Part 1 - Pro-abortion report - anti-Christian hate speech?

Part 2 - Pro-abortion report - uses US experience of PCCs

ABORTION RIGHTS COALITION OF CANADA DECEITFUL ON CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTRES A Critique to ARCC’s “Review of Crisis Pregnancy Centre Websites in Canada”

October 2022 Pregnancy Care Centres in Canada:  A Necessary Rebuttal 

Crisis Pregnancy Centres In British Columbia A Respectful Rebuttal to a Disrespectful Report 

CPCs a target for calumny -- they won't refer for abortion refutes this Crisis Pregnancy Centers in Canada and Reproductive Justice Organizations’ Responses (Li references the Abortion Rights Coalition numerous hit jobs on CPCs. Of course she does.)

Slides from ATIP repeating the misinformation and disinformation from the pro-abortion ARCC

The Cart Access Project from a slide show: Page 413 Beware of Fake clinics...Crisis pregnancy centres ... actively mislead patients (For the record CART received tax payer funding of $4,387,931).

 

The pro-aborts think abortion is healthcare

Update July 23 VICTORY: Billboard Company Removes Abortion Ad After Pro-life Protest by Gianna Amata:

ARCC ran a counter campaign to pressure the company to keep the billboard up. It sent an email blast on July 15, encouraging supporters to reach out to the company to save the billboard. But the company refused to back down. ARCC later admitted that some of the letters supporters sent were hostile, for which it later apologized.

“Sadly, amongst the messages they [the billboard company] received from our supporters were some aggressive ones and even personal attacks on their staff, which caused harm and trauma,” Joyce Arthur, ARCC’s Executive Director, wrote in a July 21 email to supporters.

This doesn't surprise me a bit. 

UPDATE July 13. Brightside has responded to me: 

...we have paused this campaign while we review the matter with our client.

UPDATE July 10. I have it on good authority that the ARCC billboard was put up by the company Brightside Network Inc .

I have good news. And I have bad news.

The pro-abortions at the Abortion Rights Coalition tried last year to find a company to put up a pro-killing of pre-born babies billboard. The good news is that 45% of the companies contacted refused to put up the billboard, and 30% didn’t respond. Smart companies.

The bad news is that one company did agree to put it up (we don't know which company). ARCC's billboard says Abortion is health care. Which of course is a lie because for the 102,705 children who were killed last year before they were born, I am pretty sure those children would disagree that abortion is healthcare. Yea I'm pretty sure about that.

If there is still any doubt that abortion is not healthcare check this out Abortion is Not Healthcare: A Message from the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Not only is abortion not health care, it is a medical atrocity and a grave legal injustice. Just as slavery and the Dred Scott decision unjustly denied the constitutional right to liberty for individuals based on race; abortion deprives innocent children their right to life based on age alone and the Roe decision has no rational basis in law.

The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine represents more than 30,000 healthcare professionals, including CMA members, committed to promoting and upholding Hippocratic medicine’s fundamental principles.

And what about the poor women who regret their abortion and or suffered psychological trauma after an abortion? That sign could be quite the trigger for them.

This ad is currently running in London Ont. I sent a letter to the mayor yesterday to voice my disapproval. You can send your own letter as well to Mayor Josh Morgan at mayor@london.ca.

Every year Canada's abortion rates go up: 2024

Canada's abortion numbers are up. Of course they are. There were 1,152 more abortions in Canada than there were in 2023. 

To make matters even worse, CIHI reported Ontario's abortions at 44,728, yet the Ontario Ministry of Health reported 53,708. So CIHI reported 8,980 less abortions than what Ontario reported.

Ontario abortions up by 1,241 from 2023

Ontario abortion numbers from the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care report 53,708 abortions in 2024. That's 1,241 more than OMHLTC reported in 2023. Every year the numbers go up. Every darn year.

Out of province abortions. Once again most of them are from Quebec.

Sneaking MAID grants into Open Government database

I learned that taxpayers paid $289,226 to MAID advocates to create a podcast on MAID called Disrupting Death. I listened to five episodes. It is a pro-euthanasia podcast, as one would expect. (Maybe other episodes will be more neutral and or against MAID but somehow I doubt it.) It reminds me of the pro-aborts who love to gush over, and celebrate, abortion. The podcast was acknowledged on the university website:

Dr. Kathy M. Kortes-Miller, School of Social Work, Disrupting Death; An examination of Canadian Experiences with Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), $289,226.

Because this is taxpayer money, I checked the government's grants and contributions database to find the grant. Which I did here. But surprise, surprise. The word MAID never appears in the description (I had to use the researcher's name to find the grant). Neither does "medical assistance in dying". In fact if you use either of those terms, or "disrupting death", to search the database, the grant does not show up. Yet clearly the money went to fund this pro-MAID podcast.

I have two questions:

1) What other grants that promote and celebrate MAID are likewise hidden in the Open Government database?

2) What are the chances that the government would also fund an anti-MAID podcast?

$5,235,696 to create a curriculum to kill people

When MAID was legalized in Canada, a curriculum was needed to teach doctors how to euthanize people.

Seven modules were developed: (1) foundations of MAiD in Canada, (2) clinical conversations that includes MAiD, (3) how to do an MAiD assessment, (4) capacity and vulnerability, (5) providing MAiD, (6) navigating complex cases with confidence, and (7) MAiD and mental disorders. An eighth topic on clinician resilience and reflection was woven into each of the 7 modules.

The curriculum was developed by the Canadian Association of MAID Assessors and Providers (CAMAP). With grants from the government. Or rather, from yours and my tax dollars. 

I requested and received two documents from a previously requested ATIP regarding CAMAP and this curriculum.

Some excerpts below from these documents. 

Here we have the invite from CAMAP sent to MAID practitioners for a workshop. Taxpayers actually paid for the airfare and hotel costs for this "workshop".

You're Invited to Our Annual Knowledge Exchange Workshop

Hello 

...Made possible with financial support from Health Canada, we are pleased to offer travel and accommodation support to ensure your participation is as seamless as possible. We will cover the costs of airfare (economy flight) and hotel arrangements for the duration of the workshop...(all emphasis added)

MAiD Research Forum 2026: Research to Inform Practice and Policy

"Conducting research to inform practice and policy is essential to high-quality MAiD care in Canada." (Can killing people be classified as "high-quality care"?)

Here we have an email to MAID practitioners looking for feedback on their MAID tool. And if you give feedback, we give you $500. Once again, taxpayers pay $500 to have doctors provide feedback on the MAID "guidance tool".

Request for Feedback on MAiD Guidance Tool and Overview Document

To:

Hello,

I hope this email finds you well. I am reaching out to request your valuable input on two documents developed by the Canadian Association of MAiD Assessors and Providers (CAMAP) to support front¬line staff in handling inquiries related to medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada: the Guidance Tool and the Overview of the Guidance Tool. Your perspective as a national stakeholder is critical to ensuring these resources meet the diverse needs of organizations and individuals across the country. As a token of our appreciation for your time and expertise, we are pleased to offer a $500 honorarium to stakeholders who provide feedback by the deadline of March 24th. There is a section of the Form for you to include your organization's name and mailing address so we can process the honorarium.

Under Frequently Asked Questions we have the MAID people tie themselves up into knots trying to convince people that MAID is not euthanasia or suicide.

Question: Is MAiD the same as euthanasia or suicide?

Suggested Response: MAiD is a legal, medical procedure conducted under strict regulatory standards. MAiD requires explicit criteria and safeguards that must be met and is performed by experienced health practitioners within the framework of Canadian law. The term ‘euthanasia’ is a much more general term, which does not encompass the strict regulations and safeguards that exist for the provision of MAiD in Canada. ‘Suicide’ in this context is viewed as an sudden, impulsive and often violent act, whereas MAiD occurs in a controlled setting as a result of a series of conversations and discussions that illustrate a well-reasoned wish to die.

Below I itemize some comments where the words used are Woo Hoo'd, excited, thrilled, amazed, incredible, and how far we've come, and the all important exclamation mark--all of this chatter is when bureaucrats and or MAID proponents are talking about killing people by euthanasia:

Thanks to the support from Health Canada, we're making this a reality!

We are thrilled to invite you to our upcoming Canadian MAiD Curriculum (CMC) Stakeholder Meeting on Wednesday, April 23, 2.025, from 11 AM-12 PMPT / 2 PM-3 PM Eï via Zoom

As we celebrate nearly three incredible years since the launch of the Canadian MAiD Curriculum and step into our final year of project funding, we’re excited to reconnect with our amazing network of stakeholders. This meeting is a chance to reflect on how far we've come, share highlights from recent learner feedback, and spotlight what's ahead, including launching an exciting new initiative: the MAiD Coordinator’s Pilot.

Woo hoo! Thanks to everyone for helping to make this happen today!

Last we have the creation of a Canadian Journal of MAID. Published twice a year. 32 pages of MAID, MAID, and more MAID. Paid for by you.

So how much has all this cost the taxpayer to date?

Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Canada will make a contribution to the Recipient of up to five million two hundred thirty-five thousand six hundred ninety-six dollars ($5,235,696) towards Eligible Expenditures. Canada's contribution will be paid as follows:

In Fiscal Year 2021-2022 up to $519,110 

In Fiscal Year 2022-2023 up to $1,196,138 

In Fiscal Year 2023-2024 up to $1,039,434 

In Fiscal Year 2024-2025 up to $1,209,816 

In Fiscal Year 2025-2026 up to $1,208,698

In Fiscal Year 2026-2027 up to $62,500 

Two sides of the MAID issue - CCCB - DWDC: 140th and 141st time lobbying government

On the one hand, we have Fr. Francis at Mass today speaking out against MAID. (I will paraphrase): St. Thomas More who is the patron saint of statesmen, politicians, lawyers, and civil servants -- we must pray against MAID / euthanasia. We belong to one fold and have to be proactive and consider what's happening in the government concerning MAID. There is a growing number of deaths and mercy killings. We must be aware of and pray for protection from birth until natural death.

Fr. Francis also included the Statement from the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) in his Sunday bulletin on MAID (I hope all parishes did the same): STATEMENT BY THE STANDING COMMITTEE FOR FAMILY AND LIFE TO THE CATHOLIC FAITHFUL IN CANADA AND ALL PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL VOICING CONCERN AND CALLING FOR PRAYERS ON THE 10TH ANNIVERSARY OF EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE (“MAID”)

As disciples of Christ, we affirm that every human life is a gift, holds profound dignity and value, and is part of a human community (cf. Mt 25:31-46). In contrast, euthanasia and assisted suicide, whatever their motives or means, consist in intentionally causing or hastening the death of a person who is sick, suffering, disabled, or dying in order to eliminate suffering. Such acts can never be morally acceptable, for they are gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to God, the Creator and Lord of life.4F 5 True compassion does not answer suffering with death, but accompanies those who suffer with hope, presence, palliative care, and relief of pain. Together with healthcare professionals, patients, and families, our faith teaches that we must strive for proportionate treatment options that neither unduly prolong nor intentionally hasten death, but instead offer life-affirming and compassionate care.

On the other hand, we have Dying with Dignity Canada's death cult lobbying government, yet again, to increase access to MAID. This is their 140th and 141st time lobbying government.

Designated public office holders: Bryn Savage, Policy Advisory, Minister of Health's Office | Health Canada (HC) Occurred: 2026-05-21

Designated public office holders: Hanife Masoomifar, Issues Manager, Minister of Justice | Justice Canada (JC) 2026-05-19

Thank God for clergy who speak out against the evil of MAID.

Instead of paying off the debt Canada invests in Pride Season

Recall how the Carney Liberals are continuing their discrimination policy against pro-life students who are not eligible to receive the Canada Summer Jobs Program. These grants are around $5,000 each. A drop in the bucket of government largesse, yet still will not ever go to a pro-life student.

Fast forward to Pride Season. Yes Virginia, Canada has a Pride Season--the only country in the world to not just celebrate Pride, but to have a whole season dedicated to it. And it's not just Pride Season, it's turning on the taps of millions and millions of dollars in new spending towards all things Pride, never mind old spending. 

Never mind that Canada's debt is now almost 3 trillion dollars (Looks like this ($3,000,000,000,000) and a current deficit of $66.9 billion.

May 26, 2026

Statement by Minister Rechie Valdez to Mark Canada’s Pride Season 2026

Pride Season is a celebration of the strength, diversity, and resilience of Canada’s 2SLGBTQI+ communities. Pride events begin this week and continue through September, offering 2SLGBTQI+ people and their allies opportunities to connect in safer spaces and celebrate the strengths of our communities.

June 9, 2026

Federal government strengthens support to keep 2SLGBTQI+ communities safe this Pride Season

Through ongoing investments in the 2SLGBTQI+ sector, including $54.6 million over five years, with $10.9 million ongoing, the federal government is supporting organizations to strengthen communities and expand participation in Canada’s economy and society. This includes $7.5 million over five years, with $1.5 million ongoing, to help Pride festivals address rising security and insurance costs and continue providing safe and welcoming spaces for participants, volunteers, families, and visitors.

Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights gets millions more in government funding

From the Lobbyist database for Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights 

End date of the last completed financial year: 2025-06-30

List of Government Funding

Government Institution	Funding Received in Last Financial Year	Funding Expected in Current Financial Year
Global Affairs Canada (GAC)	$697,727.00	Yes
Health Canada (HC)	$1,316,065.00	Yes
Indigenous Services Canada (ISC)	$694,524.00	Yes
Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)	$397,796.00	Yes
Women and Gender Equality (WAGE)	$242,922.00	Yes

This totals $3,349,034 (This is $124,939 less than what CRA reports, see below). But it does show which departments are forking out your money to them.

Employees who lobby for the organization

---

• Frederique Chabot, Executive Director
• Meghan Doherty, Co-Director Policy and Advocacy
• Brianna Parent Long, Policy & Advocacy Officer
• Ana Laura Zarco Fuentes, Policy & Advocacy Officer

Then there's the grants database, which is clearly not up-to-date. The first entry is for grants identified in 2024. Nothing shows for 2025.

From CRA for Fiscal period: July 01, 2024 to June 30, 2025: Government funding $3,473,973. 

CRA is my go to for the most accurate financial information for charities. 

Maybe one day we will see a pro-life charity get $3,473,973 in government funding. That. Would be. A miracle.

Dying With Dignity Canada lobbies government 139 times and counting / 2025 financial statements

Dying with Dignity Canada most recent government lobbying

Type: Consultant
Lobbyist: Tom Potter, Blackbird Strategies, Ltd.
Registration: 6 of 6 (2026-05-25 to present)
Posted: 2026-05-25

-------------------------

A couple of notes on Dying with Dignity's recently published 2025 financial statements.

DWDC has long-term investments of $8,160,832 (2025), up from $7,370,174 (2024). Imagine a charity so rich that they can afford to keep more than $8 million in long-term investments--money that clearly isn't needed to run the business. They also received $646,153 in investment income alone. Can you imagine a pro-life charity being this rich? Neither can I.

My guess is that they will use this great big juicy horde of cash to pay for their Charter challenges (British Columbia court battle and the Mental Illness Exclusion Challenge in Ontario), and when they act as intervenors in other court cases. Lots of cash to do this. 

Donations are up: $ 2,976,918 (2025), from $ 2,759,606 (2024).

(I still puzzle why anyone would donate to this pro-death group who advocate, lobby and promote killing people. Why does Dying with Dignity even exist? Is it because of power? Or money? Or are they just plain old run of the mill lunatic psychopaths?)

Advertising and promotions $1,013,241 (2025), up from $803,555 (2024). That's over one third of their donations spent on advertising and promoting and lobbying the government for the killing industry.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition has applied to be intervenor in the Brosseau case launched by Dying with Dignity. 

The Brosseau case is asking an Ontario court to legislate from the bench by approving medical homicide for Claire Brosseau who is living with mental illness alone. Court interventions are very expensive. We need your support.

If you can, please give a donation to help EPC.  

Euthanasia: then and now

Hitler's euthanasia Program and Aktion T4:

(All emphasis added)

"The goal of the Nazi Euthanasia Program was to kill people with mental and physical disabilities. In the Nazi view, this would cleanse the “Aryan” race of people considered genetically defective and a financial burden to society. In the Nazi context, however, "euthanasia" was a euphemistic or indirect term for a clandestine murder program and Aktion T4."

(MAID: Must have a serious and incurable illness, disease, or disability. Under Canadian law, if your only medical condition is a mental illness, you are not eligible to receive MAID until March 17, 2027. However, if you have a mental illness alongside other qualifying physical conditions, you may still be assessed for eligibility.)

The UN on MAID: "Rosemary Kayess, Committee Expert and Leader of the Taskforce for Canada, said it was concerning that persons with disabilities sought access to medical assistance in dying due to unmet needs, which was a systemic failure of the State party. The disproportionate impact of these failures, which included poverty, and a lack of access to employment and services, underpinned the so-called choice for seeking medical assistance in dying as an alternative. How was this not State-sanctioned euthanasia? If choice was the trigger, why was there not also a focus on addressing the support that person needed, which would take them away from social isolation where they perceived dying as the only option they had?"

Hitler's euthanasia Program: "In the autumn of 1939, Adolf Hitler signed a secret authorization in order to protect participating physicians, medical staff, and administrators from prosecution."

(MAID: Doctors in Canada are protected from being prosecuted for providing Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) through specific exemptions in the federal Criminal Code.

Hitler's euthanasia Program: "Even though physicians and institutional administrators falsified official records in every case to indicate that the victims died of natural causes, the "euthanasia" program quickly became an open secret. There was widespread public knowledge of the measure."

(MAID: the cause of death is reported as the underlying illness, disease, or disability that necessitated the procedure.) 

Mark Carney's government continues its discriminatory practice against pro-life students

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Patricia Maloney 
Date: Tue, May 26, 2026 at 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: Taxpayer funded summer job grants
To: EDSC.SM.CORR.DEPT-MS.CORR.DEPT.ESDC@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca <EDSC.SM.CORR.DEPT-MS.CORR.DEPT.ESDC@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca>
Cc: Patricia Maloney <maloneyp64@gmail.com>, Prime Minister/Premier ministre <pm@pm.gc.ca>, <mark.carney@parl.gc.ca>, <Patty.Hajdu@parl.gc.ca>

Dear Mauricette Howlett,

You state that:

job activities respect reproductive rights, including the right to abortion, as a condition for receiving federal funding...All employers under the CSJ program are required to provide a safe and inclusive work environment that respects individual human rights as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. When applying for funding through the CSJ program, organizations must attest that any funding under the CSJ program will not be used to undermine or restrict the exercise of rights legally protected in Canada.

As we know, and have known for many years, there is no Charter right to abortion -- abortion is not legally protected in Canada. 

This means that the young people who are prevented from accessing the summer jobs programs are being discriminated against because of their religious beliefs since it is faith based organizations and persons who are the ones not eligible for the grants because of their opposition to abortion. Even if there was a charter right to abortion, and there isn't, preventing someone from receiving the funding based on their deeply held religious beliefs would still be discrimination.

Canada supposedly prides itself in its freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief, opinion, speech, assembly and association. But only sometimes. And only when the government says so. This is wrong.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Patricia Maloney

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 1:47 PM NC-INFO-HRSDC_RHDSC-GD <nc-info-hrsdc-rhdsc-gd@servicecanada.gc.ca> wrote:

Dear Patricia Maloney:

 

On behalf of the Honourable Patty Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario, I am responding to your email, which the Office of the Prime Minister, the Right Honourable Mark Carney, sent to her on April 22, 2026, as well as your follow-up email to Minister Hajdu of May 10, 2026. You wrote about the launch of Canada Summer Jobs (CSJ) 2026 and the availability of 100,000 positions for young people.

 

In your emails, you specifically raised concerns about the 2018 policy which requires CSJ program applicants to attest that their core mandate and the job activities respect reproductive rights, including the right to abortion, as a condition for receiving federal funding. You indicated that this requirement could result in the exclusion of organizations with pro‑life beliefs and asked whether this policy would be discontinued under the current government. I appreciate your taking the time to write and convey your perspective on this matter.

 

The objective of CSJ is to create quality jobs for youth across Canada by providing them with valuable work experiences during the summer employment period so that they gain and develop skills and competencies.

 

All employers under the CSJ program are required to provide a safe and inclusive work environment that respects individual human rights as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. When applying for funding through the CSJ program, organizations must attest that any funding under the CSJ program will not be used to undermine or restrict the exercise of rights legally protected in Canada.

 

In addition, all CSJ applications are assessed against 15 eligibility criteria outlined in the CSJ Applicant Guide. The CSJ Articles of Agreement outline the obligations of applicants to ensure that all funded job opportunities take place in a safe, inclusive and healthy work environment free from harassment and discrimination.

 

Employers who are approved for CSJ funding sign agreements confirming that they have understood and will comply with the rules of the program. The Department conducts a range of monitoring activities to ensure that funding is used according to the terms of the program outlined in the agreement with each employer. The provision of false and misleading information or failure to comply with the Articles of Agreement may result in revocation of funding.

 

Each year, the Department makes modifications to improve CSJ based on the feedback received from participants and stakeholders and will continue to implement as many innovative changes as possible to improve program delivery and adapt it to address the evolving needs of youth and employers across the country.

 

I hope that this information is helpful in addressing your concerns.

 

Yours sincerely, 

 

 

 

 

 

Mauricette Howlett

Director General

Workforce Development and Youth

Program Operations Branch

Service Canada

On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 4:39 PM Patricia Maloney wrote:

Dear Ms. Hajdu,

I look forward to your response to my question to the Prime Minister.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Patricia Maloney

On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 1:50 PM Prime Minister | Premier Ministre <PM@pm.gc.ca> wrote:

Dear Ms. Maloney:

On behalf of the Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada, I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated April 21, 2026.

The Prime Minister values feedback and suggestions from Canadians, and he appreciates the time you have taken to offer your views. Please be assured that your communication has been received and carefully read.

At the federal level, responsibility for the issue you raise rests with the Minister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario, the Honourable Patty Hajdu. For this reason, I am sharing your remarks with the Minister for information and consideration.

Thank you for writing.

J.P. Vachon
Manager / Gestionnaire
Executive Correspondence Services/Services de la correspondance de la haute direction


------------------- Original Message -------------------
From: Patricia Maloney
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026, 4:15 PM
To: mark.carney@parl.gc.ca;
Cc: maloneyp64@gmail.com; media@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca; Jennifer.kozelj@labour-travail.gc.ca; PM@pm.gc.ca; mona.fortier@parl.gc.ca; pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca
Subject: Taxpayer funded summer job grants

Dear Mark Carney,

Today you announced the summer jobs program grants:
https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/news/2026/04/canada-summer-jobs-2026-youth-hiring-period-now-open-with-up-to-100000-jobs-available.html?utm_campaign=esdc-edsc-censv2-24-25&utm_medium=email&utm_source=news-from-the-government-of-canada&utm_content=news-product-260420-en-2pm
There are 100,000 jobs available.
Will your Liberal government now put an end to Justin Trudeau's discriminatory practice of excluding pro-life people from receiving these grants?
As a self-proclaimed practicing Catholic one would think that you would be happy to not exclude those who hold Christian beliefs that the child in the womb is as valuable as any other Canadian human being and that organizations who espouse pro-life beliefs are as worthy of taxpayer funded summer job opportunities as any other Canadian.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Patricia Maloney