Friday, March 6, 2026

Dying with Dignity so much lobbying - so little time

 The latest lobbying by Dying with Dignity. Got to use up all those millions in donations.

  • Peggy Ainslie, Executive Director | Health Canada (HC)  2026-02-26
  • Kajan Ratneswaran, Manager, Health Policy Branch | Health Canada (HC) 2026-02-26
  • Rachel Putnins, Director of Parliamentary Affairs, MP Will Greaves | House of Commons 2026-01-21
  • Thomas Law, Advisory, Policy and Regional Affairs | Justice Canada (JC) 2025-12-15
  • Julie Robinson, Legal Counsel for Constitutional Affairs and Intergovernmental Relations | Justice Canada (JC) 2025-12-15

Dying with Dignity meets the Minister of Justice - of course they do

"I would like to start by thanking Dying with Dignity Canada for the role your organization has played in relation to medical assistance in dying(or MAID) in Canada."

How pathetic is that? Congratulating the euthanasia cult in Canada.

From an ATIP to the Minister of Justice. The Minister is briefed on his upcoming meeting with Dying with Dignity on July 9, 2025:

"Title: Meeting of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice with Dying with Dignity Canada

Overview

You have a meeting with Dying with Dignity Canada (DWDC) on July 9, 2025. DWDC wants to meet to discuss how the Government can support the legalization of advance requests to receive medical assistance in dying (MAID) and the role that DWDC can play. Proposed talking points are attached at Annex 1.

DWDC is a human-rights charity committed to improving quality of dying, protecting end-of-life rights, and helping people avoid unwanted suffering. It is one of the largest pro-MAID advocacy groups in Canada and advocates for the expansion of MAID regarding advance requests, mental illness, and mature minors. DWDC have submitted briefs and testified before Parliamentary committees on the various bills and studies concerning MAID.

Background

Federal MAID Framework

On June 17, 2016, MAID was legalized in Canada for persons whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable through former Bill C-14, after the Supreme Court of Canada held in Carter v Canada (2015) that the criminal laws prohibiting assistance in dying were unconstitutional. Sections 241.1-241.4 of the Criminal Code now outline eligibility criteria and safeguards, while amendments to sections 227, 241 and 245 provide exemptions from offences such as homicide, where all of the eligibility criteria and safeguards are satisfied.

In 2019, the Superior Court of Quebec declared the requirement that natural death be reasonably foreseeable to be unconstitutional(Truchon). This decision declared the MAID framework at that time unconstitutional, stating the “reasonable foreseeability of natural death” criterion violates section 7 of the Charter for being too restrictive. The Attorney General of Canada did not appeal this decision and instead made the policy choice to expand eligibility for MAID. The eligibility for MAID was expanded to persons whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable through former Bill C-7, which received royal assent on March 17, 2021. Former Bill C-7 also temporarily excluded persons whose sole underlying condition is a mental illness from eligibility for MAID. Per former Bill C-7’s coming into force provisions, this exclusion outlined in subsection 1(2.1) was originally set to be repealed on the second anniversary of the coming into force of the bill, March 17, 2023. On March 9, 2023, through former Bill C-39, this was extended by one year to three years from the coming into force of former BillC-7. It was once again extended a further three years (for a total of six years from the coming into force of former Bill C-7) through former Bill C-62, until March 17, 2027. Bill C- 62 included a section that requires a joint parliamentary committee to undertake a comprehensive review relating to the eligibility for MAID of persons whose sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness that must commence by February 28, 2026. There has been criticism from stakeholders on the delay of the repeal of subsection 1(2.1)

MAID and Advance Requests

An advance request refers to situations where a person requests MAID before they are eligible and before they want to receive it and outlines the circumstances under which they would want to receive MAID, in the future, if such circumstances arise after they lose capacity. This is different than the waiver of final consent that permits a person whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable and who has been approved for MAID but risks losing capacity before the date on which MAID is scheduled to be provided to waive the requirement for final consent. Under federal law, this is the only circumstance under which MAID may be lawfully provided to a person who does not have capacity. The provision of MAID based on an advance request is not permitted under the Criminal Code.

MAID is a matter of shared jurisdiction. The criminal law aspect falls under the responsibility of the federal government while the health care aspect, including its implementation, falls under the responsibility of the provinces and territories. On June 7, 2023, the National Assembly of Quebec passed Bill 11, An Act to amend the Act respecting end-of-life care and other legislative provisions, which amended Quebec’s end-of-life law to permit the provision of MAID based on an advance request in the province. This is not permitted under the Criminal Code and so a practitioner in Quebec who provides MAID in accordance with Quebec’s law would commit a criminal offence (murder).

The previous Health and Justice ministers said publicly that the federal government would not initiate a challenge regarding the constitutionality of Quebec’s law, but that it remains a criminal offence to provide MAID based on an advance request. The previous government undertook a national conversation on advance requests from November 2024 to February 2025 to better understand the perceptions and views of people in Canada. Health Canada is expected to publish a report on key findings from the national conversation.

Talking Points

Meeting with Dying with Dignity Canada

•I would like to start by thanking Dying with Dignity Canada for the role your organization has played in relation to medical assistance in dying(or MAID) in Canada.

•The Government of Canada is committed to working with all partners and stakeholders to ensure that our MAID Laws reflect Canadians’ evolving needs, protect those who may be vulnerable, and support autonomy and freedom of choice.

•I am interested to hear your perspectives given the on-the-ground expertise your membership brings to this complex and deeply personal issue."

Saturday, February 21, 2026

The truth about Canada's evil euthanasia regime as told by an American

Dear Mark Carney, Please watch this video from Matt Walsh an American who comments on the unmitigated evil of Canada's euthanasia regime.

Matt Walsh says:

Canada is one of the most evil regimes on the planet. There is a better argument for invading Canada than invading anywhere else. The regime that runs Canada are pure and unmitigated evil.

 

It is actually stunning how Matt Walsh has the guts to say the actual unvarnished truth about our horrific euthanasia reality here in Canada. Very stark. Very true. Very evil. 

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

A small taste of LGBTQ funding (using your tax dollars)

$10,000,000 spent on just five LGBTQ organizations

This week the federal government announced new funding to Sudbury Queers United Around Diversity 

Sudbury Queers United Around Diversity funding from the past $302,742

Check out more LGBTQ funding recipients (not all of them, just five) explicitly posted on the government's website...all courtesy of your tax dollars.

1) Enchanté Network 
"Based in Ottawa, the Enchanté Network is Canada’s largest network of 2SLGBTQI+ organizations. They connect queer, trans, and Two-Spirit organizations with each other, with key capacity-building programming, and have a clear focus on collective public policy advocacy. Their network is made up of more than 200 2SLGBTQI+ organizations spanning every province and territory in the country."
Past funding $5,565,534

"The Conseil québécois LGBT has one thing in common with several LGBTQIA2+ organizations: it aims for systemic change to promote the inclusion of LGBTQIA2+ people in all spheres of society."
Past funding $1,301,717

3) Pride Season isn’t just a celebration
Everything you wanted to know about Pride season but were afraid to ask.
"...it’s a protest, a commemoration, and a call to action. Its roots lie in centuries of resistance to discrimination, violence, and erasure."
4) TransCare+ 
"Find out how TransCare+ is creating better care for all Canadians by becoming a hub of resources and a safe space for knowledge sharing."
Past funding $1,246,270

5) JusticeTrans 
"With their new research report on Two-Spirit, trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming communities across the country, JusticeTrans is improving access to justice one data point at a time."
Past funding $1,542,966

That's $9,959,229 of your tax dollars given to only five of these organizations. A drop in the bucket of the total tax dollars going to LGBTQ organizations.

Monday, February 16, 2026

Canada hides tax dollars going to abortions in Uganda and Mozambique

Dear Information Commissioner,

I would like to submit my complaint to you regarding my ATIP to Global Affairs using Sections 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(c) of the federal Access to Information Act. See attached letter below. It would seem that this refusal is a work around to an open, transparent, accountable government. 

The tax dollars going to these third party organizations (Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) the Guttmacher Institute) are hidden from public scrutiny by the very fact that they are given to these organizations through the primary source organization (Oxfam), so that they can be hidden from public disclosure. 

IPPF is a global international company and the Guttmacher Institute is an American company--they aren't even Canadian companies and yet the Canadian dollars they receive is hidden from Canadian scrutiny. None of this is in the public interest.

In other words, if I am a company that does not want the public to know how much money I am getting from the government (AKA the public purse), I simply need to piggyback onto a primary company who receives funds and voila, the public is none the wiser of where their hard earned tax dollars are going and what they are being used for. 

This is definitely not open, not transparent, and not accountable to the public.

Can you please look into this?

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Patricia Maloney

My ATIP that I was refused access to:
“For this contract to Oxfam. How much of the grant went to (or will go to) Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights? Agreement Number: 7433891P008437001. Also what other organizations received monies from this contract, and how much money did each of them receive, or will receive? Also how much did International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) the Guttmacher Institute receive, or will receive?”

This is what the $19,638,400 grant was for:

"This project aims to improve access to high quality and gender-sensitive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services for vulnerable adolescent girls and young women, between the ages of 15 and 24, in Mozambique and Uganda. Projects activities include: (1) recruiting and training peer educators and facilitators to raise awareness of topics related to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) amongst beneficiaries in the targeted communities; (2) holding training sessions for adolescent girls and women, and engaging with men, boys and community-leaders to raise awareness of SRHR and address discriminatory social norms; (3) delivering training to health care providers and providing local health care facilities with the appropriate equipment to deliver gender-responsive and youth-friendly SRH services, including access to contraceptives, safe abortion (where legal), post-abortion care, and secondary prevention services for gender-based violence; and (4) organizing advocacy campaigns alongside local women’s and girls’ rights organizations to push for better and more accessible SRH services, and the adoption of rights- and evidence-based policies in both Uganda and Mozambique. The project seeks to benefit nearly 500,000 people, 95% of whom are adolescent girls and young women between the ages of 15 and 24. Oxfam Canada is implementing this project in partnership with the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the Guttmacher Institute, Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, and various Women’s Rights Organizations and Youth-led Organizations across Uganda and Mozambique."

Final thought. Why are Canadian taxpayers paying for abortions in Uganda and Mozambique? And why are Canadian tax dollars paying for "organizing advocacy campaigns" for abortion in Uganda and Mozambique?