Sunday, February 28, 2016

Civil disobedience needed in doctor assisted suicide

"Bruyère hospital says it will not offer the practice [of assisted suicide] or refer patients to doctors who do when it becomes legal. In a memo to staff Bruyère says it must follow with its sponsor, the Catholic Health Sponsors of Ontario. The CHSO provides sponsorship to 21 health care organizations and says the practice of physician assisted death is "incompatible with the mission and values of its Catholic Health providers.""
I hope a lot more hospitals follow suit. I hope hospitals and doctors across the entire country refuse to kill their patients.

Forcing doctors to kill patients or refer patients to be killed is wrong. This is not a difficult concept to understand. Some may say they have a right to assisted suicide. Wrong. They have a right to kill themselves, but they do not have the right to force someone else to be involved in this killing. Just because the Supreme Court of Canada said doctors have to do this, doesn't make it any less wrong. It is still wrong. It was wrong 100 years ago. It was wrong a 1000 years ago. And it is still wrong today.

Perhaps we need a little civil disobedience across this country? Perhaps this is what is needed?

Friday, February 26, 2016

How Canada tortured 2,542 preborn children in 2014

In 2014 Canadian doctors tortured and killed (through D&E abortions) at least 1,851 preborn children. (This does not include those abortions done in Quebec or in clinics, but hospitals only.) *

We can safely assume that the same percentage (7.5%) would also apply to Quebec, or 691 (9,221 X 7.5%) done in Quebec.

That's at least 2,542 D&E hospital abortions done in one year. (CIHI doesn't publish the types of abortions done in clinics so this number is likely much higher.)

What is interesting about this torturing of fetuses, is that Amnesty International thinks that women deprived of having an abortion are tortured.
"The total ban on abortion in El Salvador is nothing less than institutionalized violence against women and a form of torture or other ill-treatment."
In fact the word torture is used a total of 33 times in Amnesty's literature, as it relates to El Salvador not allowing women to undergo abortion there.

Some may not like my using the term torture to refer to the killing of preborn children in this manner. Those people should watch this video by Dr. Anthony Levatino. Dr. Levatino had performed over 1200 abortions before he gave up on doing abortions, and became pro-life. He describes for us, exactly what happens in a D&E abortion (done between 13 and 24 weeks of pregnancy).

This is the size of the baby in utero at 20 weeks. It is 7 inches long from head to rump and excluding the legs, or the size of a man'a hand.



After the woman is prepped, etc, the suction is turned on and pale yellow amniotic liquid is sucked out of the uterus.


The baby is too big to extract with the vacuum because she can't fit through the catheter. As well, the baby's limbs and head are too large to be removed by suction alone.

So a D&E is performed.

The sopher clamp is used for a D&E. This is a grasping instrument. It is about 13 inches long and made of stainless steal. The "business" end (Dr. Levatino actually called it that) is about 2 1/2 inches long and about 1/2 inch wide. There are rows of sharp teeth along it. When the sopher clamp gets hold of something, it does not let go. It is quite effective.


The abortionist uses this clamp to grasp an arm or a leg. Once he has a hold of something, he pulls hard in order to tear the limb from the baby's body.

In this illustration a leg has been pulled off and an arm is currently being extracted. One by one the rest of the limbs are removed, along with the intestines, the spine, and the heart and lungs.


Usually the most difficult part is extracting the baby's head which is the size of a large plum at 20 weeks. The head is grasped and crushed. The abortionist knows he's crushed the scull when a white substance comes out of the cervix. This was the baby's brains.


So what then is the real definition of torture? Is it preventing women from having an abortion? Or is it the dismemberment of a fetus, limb by limb, spine, intestines and lungs and then crushing her head?

* CIHI abortion stats 2014


Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Cassie and Molly's Law

This morning MP Cathay Wagantall introduced a Private Member's Bill, Bill C-225 into Parliament. (See Molly Matters for more information on Molly and Cassie.)

More info here.
BILL C-225
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (injuring or causing the death of a preborn child while committing an offence)
FIRST READING, FEBRUARY 23, 2016

SUMMARY
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to make it an offence to cause injury or death to a preborn child while committing or attempting to commit an offence against a pregnant woman and to add pregnancy as an aggravating circumstance for the purpose of sentencing.
Available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address:
http://www.parl.gc.ca


1st Session, 42nd Parliament
64-65 Elizabeth II, 2015-2016
HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA
BILL C-225
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (injuring or causing the death of a preborn child while committing an offence)
Preamble
Whereas Cassie Kaake was seven months pregnant and eagerly anticipating the birth of her daughter Molly when she was brutally murdered in Windsor, Ontario, in 2014;
Whereas no charges could be laid for Molly’s death because existing criminal law does not recognize the injury or death caused to a preborn child as a separate offence when a pregnant woman is the victim of a crime, even if the sole purpose of her attacker is to kill her child;
Whereas not being considered a human being under the Criminal Code does not mean that a preborn child does not deserve protection under the law;
Whereas a majority of Canadians support the adoption of legislation that would make it a separate offence to cause injury or death to a preborn child during the commission of an offence against the child’s mother;
Whereas Parliament wishes to address this gap in the law and allow for two charges to be laid in such circumstances;
And whereas Parliament wishes to more strongly denounce violence against pregnant women by explicitly including pregnancy as an aggravating circumstance in sentencing;
Now, therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:

Short Title
Short title
1 This Act may be cited as the Protection of Pregnant Women and Their Preborn Children Act (Cassie and Molly's Law).
R.‍S.‍, c. C-46

Criminal Code
2 The Criminal Code is amended by adding the following after section 238:
Definition of preborn child
238.‍1 (1) For the purposes of this section, preborn child means a child at any stage of development that has not yet become a human being within the meaning of section 223.
Offence — causing the death of a preborn child while committing an offence
(2) Every person who, while committing or attempting to commit an offence under this Act against a female person that the person knows is pregnant, directly or indirectly causes the death of her preborn child
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
(i) if the person means to cause injury or death to the preborn child or injury to the mother that the person knows is likely to cause the preborn child’s death, and is reckless as to whether death ensues or not, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of 10 years,
(ii) if the person shows wanton or reckless disregard for the life or safety of the preborn child, to imprisonment for life, or
(iii) in any other case, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 18 months.
Reduced punishment
(3) An offence that would otherwise be punishable under subparagraph (2)‍(a)‍(i) may be punishable by imprisonment for life if the person who committed the offence did so in the heat of passion caused by sudden provocation as described in section 232.
Offence — injuring a preborn child while committing an offence
(4) Every person who, while committing or attempting to commit an offence under this Act against a female person that the person knows is pregnant, directly or indirectly causes injury to her preborn child
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding10 years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 18 months.
Separate offence
(5) An offence referred to in this section is not included in any offence committed against the mother of the preborn child.
3 Paragraph 718.‍2(a) of the Act is amended by adding the following after subparagraph (ii.‍1):
(ii.‍2) evidence that the offender, in committing the offence, abused a person who they knew was pregnant,
4 Section 743.‍6 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (1.‍2):
Power of court to delay parole
(1.‍3) Despite section 120 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, if an offender receives a sentence of imprisonment, including a sentence of imprisonment for life, on conviction for an offence under subsection 238.‍1(2), the court shall order that the portion of the sentence that must be served before the offender may be released on full parole is one half of the sentence or 10 years, whichever is less, unless the court is satisfied, having regard to the circumstances of the commission of the offence and the character and circumstances of the offender, that the expression of society’s denunciation of the offence and the objectives of specific and general deterrence would be adequately served by a period of parole ineligibility determined in accordance with that Act.

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Good-bye CFRA

I've had it with CRFA. Now they've laid off Mark Sutcliffe, John Counsell, Ron Corbett and Nick Vandergragt. This after they laid off other hosts a while ago, and Steve Winogron a year ago. Steve Madely retired recently (at least that's the official story).

Mark Sutcliffe was the only reason I've continued listening to CFRA as of late. Now that he's gone, well that's it for me. Rob Snow is still there, but for how long? And Brian Lilley is on in the evenings but I don't listen in the evenings.

Bell media owns CTV and CFRA and Lord knows I can't stand Bell (who lied to me) or CTV, who ripped apart CPCs in BC, based on Joyce Arthur's inaccurate, atrocious, nonsensical, fictitional "report":
http://bc.ctvnews.ca/surrey-charity-gives-dubious-abortion-advice-investigation-1.754309
http://bc.ctvnews.ca/national-christian-charity-probes-questionable-advice-on-abortion-1.754285
http://bc.ctvnews.ca/schools-suspend-counselling-centre-s-sex-ed-classes-1.754359

I don't know what Sutcliffe's or Corbett's abortion leanings are, but Counsell, Vandergragt, Madely, and Winogron were all pro-life. Interesting coincidence? 

CTV and Bell deserve each other. It's just too bad they had to decimate whatever was still good at CFRA.