"Hours after Liberal candidate Khalil Ramal’s pro-life bonafides were brought up in an AM980 interview, a Team Trudeau spokesperson has said that Ramal will fall in line and vote pro-choice, if elected."Seems getting into power is more important than standing by his beliefs. How can you trust a person like this anyway?
Friday, October 2, 2015
"Team Trudeau" ensures pro-life candidate abandons beliefs
Khalil Ramal will vote to protect womens’ "right to choose" abortion. Nothing strange there. Except that Ramal used to be pro-life:
Saturday, September 26, 2015
Time for change in Ottawa-Vanier
The
following quotes regarding abortion were made by Liberal leader
Justin Trudeau:
“It’s not for any government to legislate what happens – what a woman chooses to do with her body."
(Justin
Trudeau doesn't understand basic biology: a fetus is not part of a
woman's body, it is a separate human being.)
“I
have made it clear that future candidates need to be completely
understanding that they will be expected to vote pro-choice on any
bills.”
(Justin
Trudeau discriminates against pro-life persons.)
"Since
1988, the Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed that a woman's right
to choose in this matter is part of her fundamental rights and
freedoms. And the Liberal party is the party of the Charter. And
Canadians need to count on the fact that Liberals, with our votes,
will defend women's rights and Charter rights."
(Justin
Trudeau doesn't understand the Canadian Charter of rights and
freedoms or the
1988
Morgentaler decision. There is no Charter right to abortion and the
Supreme Court never recognized a Charter right to abortion. See
morgentalerdecision.ca)
“As
someone who was raised Roman Catholic, and who attended a Jesuit
school, I understand that it is difficult for people of deep faith to
set their beliefs aside in order to serve Canadians who may not share
those beliefs.”
(Justin Trudeau expects Catholics to set aside their beliefs in order to qualify for public office. Does he expect Muslims or Jews, or those of any other religious faith to set their beliefs aside too? And do Catholics have to set aside just their beliefs about abortion? What about other beliefs Catholics hold like duty to help the poor, to respect and be good stewards of God's creation, to minister to the sick, etc. Do Catholics have to set aside those beliefs too? Why does Justin's belief system (that abortion is a "woman's right") trump the belief system of others?)
“But
for me, this is what liberalism is all about. It is the idea that
private belief, while it ought to be valued and respected, is
fundamentally different from public duty.”
(Justin Trudeau thinks private belief is different from public duty. Do we really want to put our trust in someone to be Prime Minister of Canada when he can so easily park his conscience at the door?
Say
no to Justin Trudeau
Say
no to Mauril Belanger
Wednesday, September 23, 2015
The inconsistencies of Justin and Thomas
First we had Justin Trudeau and his own relentless war on science, while saying that a Liberal government would end the war on science. Now we have Thomas Mulcair saying this about his $15 a day daycare:
Why doesn't he instead help women choose birth over abortion? Why doesn't he instead really help women and outlaw abortion coercion? Why doesn't Thomas Mulcair do something good for women, for families and for the economy?
Imagine if instead of aborting 100,000 Canadians every year, Canadian women gave birth to them? Now that would be growing the economy.
(Note that this study by IMF shows that universal daycare harms children.)
"Starting a family is not only good for that couple, it's good for the economy."So if starting a family is good for the couple and the economy, why does Mr. Mulcair support abortion?
Why doesn't he instead help women choose birth over abortion? Why doesn't he instead really help women and outlaw abortion coercion? Why doesn't Thomas Mulcair do something good for women, for families and for the economy?
Imagine if instead of aborting 100,000 Canadians every year, Canadian women gave birth to them? Now that would be growing the economy.
(Note that this study by IMF shows that universal daycare harms children.)
Monday, September 21, 2015
Euthanasia comes to Canada
This is where Canada is headed, Euthanasia on demand. It's what is happening in Belgium. We already have abortion on demand. And now euthanasia. How depressing.
The woman in the video is healthy, and of sound mind. Her daughter died and the mother Simone, is grieving. As her doctor says, "she has had it." Time to die. What a way to treat someone who is depressed. Kill them.
The woman in the video is healthy, and of sound mind. Her daughter died and the mother Simone, is grieving. As her doctor says, "she has had it." Time to die. What a way to treat someone who is depressed. Kill them.
Justin Trudeau - the truth is what you believe it to be
Justin Trudeau said:
Science does not say that a pre-born human is an artichoke or a cat. Science does not say that a pre-born human is a part of its mother's body.
So if the war on science ends with the Liberal government, does this mean Justin Trudeau will reverse his stand on abortion? That he will recognize a pre-born child for what it really is, a biological, physical, emotional, and spiritual human being separate from its mother, and worthy of protection?
Or will Justin Trudeau continue to cherry pick which category of human beings should be protected under the Canadian Charter with his own relentless war on science (in this case, the science of of human embryology)?
'War on science ends with the Liberal government'Okay. Well science says that a pre-born child has the same DNA as a human being. Science says that a pre-born being of human parents is a human being. Science says that a pre-born human is a separate human being from its mother. Science says that a pre-born human has it's own blood type, it's own blood circulation and its own brain that controls all of its bodily and psychological functions.
Science does not say that a pre-born human is an artichoke or a cat. Science does not say that a pre-born human is a part of its mother's body.
So if the war on science ends with the Liberal government, does this mean Justin Trudeau will reverse his stand on abortion? That he will recognize a pre-born child for what it really is, a biological, physical, emotional, and spiritual human being separate from its mother, and worthy of protection?
Or will Justin Trudeau continue to cherry pick which category of human beings should be protected under the Canadian Charter with his own relentless war on science (in this case, the science of of human embryology)?
Because when we change the truth to make it what we want it to be, and not what it objectively is, the truth becomes meaningless."EveryoneSome human beings has[ve] the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)