Congratulations, Pat. You and your team have accomplished something very special in this outcome. Thank you for your courage and strength of conviction to see that the Ontario government was taken to task on this important issue. This proves that one can 'fight city hall.'
Dear pro-abortion Joyce Arthur, you say "In 2013, lawsuit applicant Patricia Maloney used aggregated abortion statistics to call for homicide investigations against providers." This is untrue. Some MPs wrote a letter to the RCMP about what I found regarding live births. So why are you saying it was me?
Congratulations, Pat. You and your team have accomplished something very special in this outcome. Thank you for your courage and strength of conviction to see that the Ontario government was taken to task on this important issue. This proves that one can 'fight city hall.'
ReplyDeleteWay to go Pat! I am grateful for your efforts for the pro-life community.
ReplyDeleteWay to go, Pat! My hero!
ReplyDeleteARCC agrees with court decision. https://www.facebook.com/notes/abortion-rights-coalition-of-canada/ontario-court-strikes-down-fippa-law-excluding-all-abortion-related-info-from-re/1472912826062948/
ReplyDeleteDear pro-abortion Joyce Arthur, remind me. When did I call for a "homicide investigation" against abortion providers?
ReplyDeleteYou provided the information for this: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/investigate-some-abortions-as-homicides-tory-mps-ask-rcmp-1.1322173
ReplyDeleteDear pro-abortion Joyce Arthur, you say "In 2013, lawsuit applicant Patricia Maloney used aggregated abortion statistics to call for homicide investigations against providers." This is untrue. Some MPs wrote a letter to the RCMP about what I found regarding live births. So why are you saying it was me?
DeleteSorry Patricia, that was a mistake. I've corrected it.
DeleteI think Fern Hill may be a little envious of you and the only thing she can do is put you down. I could be wrong.
ReplyDeleteI was answering Patricia's question. My main point was to inform
ReplyDeleteyou that ARCC agrees with the court decision. That's all.