I'm always dumbfounded by the inane and gloriously off-the-wall-and-off-topic-comments I often read on articles posted online on anything that could be even remotely associated with pro-life viewpoints.
To see what I mean check out Andrea Mrozek's thoughtful and coherant article posted on Huffington Post about doctor's freedom of conscience rights.
I think some of these commentors might want to stop talking about their disdain at doctors practicing freedom of conscience rights--which I might add are actual rights and not make-believe rights like "abortion rights"--and instead educate themselves on the subject.
But no. They'd prefer to hear themselves blather on instead. I think they just like to see their name in print. I guess it makes them feel important.
So here's the thing. Freedom of conscience is a right
guaranteed under our Canadian Charter. That means everyone, including
doctors have this right. It's not a right for the few, it is a right for all.
If you don't like the fact that a doctor won't provide you with your contraception, then you are free to go elsewhere for it. Nobody's forcing you to go to that doctor. The choice crowd is in love with the word "choice". So use it. Because I'd prefer to know my doctor bases his medical expertise in concert with his conscience, and doesn't ignore it. I imagine there were doctors who went against their conscience in the concentration camps in Auschwitz. Not something (I hope) we would ever want from our own doctors.
If you don't like the fact that a doctor won't provide you with your contraception, then you are free to go elsewhere for it. Nobody's forcing you to go to that doctor. The choice crowd is in love with the word "choice". So use it. Because I'd prefer to know my doctor bases his medical expertise in concert with his conscience, and doesn't ignore it. I imagine there were doctors who went against their conscience in the concentration camps in Auschwitz. Not something (I hope) we would ever want from our own doctors.
Here's something else to ponder for those who who like to hear themselves talk and say nothing. Joyce
Arthur also thinks conscientious objection for doctors shouldn't be allowed. But
surprisingly, not all of her compatriots agree with her: Global
Doctors for Choice, bpas (The British pregnancy Advisory Service),
and the International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (IJGO),
all believe that conscientious objection should be allowed.
No comments:
Post a Comment