Friday, August 17, 2012

Big abortion and the CMA

The CMA has officially come out in support of maintaining a section of the Criminal Code that declares a child becomes a human being at the moment of birth.

One doctor, Dr. Genevieve Desbiens said this:
“I’m asking for you to recognize that women must retain their full and complete rights.”

Really? Can't the CMA do better than that? This "woman's rights" horse manure, really is getting too boring for words. Can't the feminists invent a new slogan? This one is just so 70's.

But here's what I cannot comprehend on any level. Shouldn't doctors know better than to say that the child is not a human being before the child is born? What exactly do they think is inside the mother's womb? A cat? A dog? A ten headed serpent? Why would a doctor do fetal surgery on a baby if not a human being, a real live person, a baby by any other name?

Oh yes I know, the CMA represents those other human beings (abortionists) who actually do the dirty deed to the defenseless human beings (the babies), so yeah, I guess it makes sense the CMA wouldn't want to admit that the children are human beings because that would be admitting some of their own colleagues are, you know, killers.

And sure, saying they support "women's rights" sounds so nice, so inclusive, so adorable. That will ease their guilty consciences, after all, how can anyone who supports "women's rights" be the bad guy?

If you'd like to read something that, God I pray, these doctors would actually spend five minutes out of their busy abortion schedule to read, it's this excerpt from Dave Andrusko (about fetal pain and testimony by a former abortion doctor) who does away with that rubbish lie and greatest urban legend of all time of "women's rights":

“Picture yourself reaching in with the Sopher clamp [an instrument for grasping and crushing tissue] grasping anything you can. At twenty-four weeks gestation, the uterus is thin and soft so be careful not to perforate or puncture the walls. Once you have grasped something inside, squeeze on the clamp to set the jaws and pull hard – really hard. You feel something let go and out pops a fully formed leg about six inches long. Reach in again and grasp whatever you can. Set the jaw and pull really hard once again and out pops an arm about the same length. Reach in again and again with that clamp and tear out the spine, intestines, heart and lungs.”

“you know you did it right if you crush down, a white material runs out of the cervix. That was the baby’s brains. Then you can pull out skull pieces. Many times a little face will come back and stare back at you…And if you think that doesn’t hurt, if you believe that isn’t an agony for the baby, please think again.”

It is becoming crystal clear to me what's going on here. An organization that has members who do the above described activity for a living wouldn't want to admit that what they are ripping tiny arms and legs from, and crushing the skulls of and spilling the brains out of are, you know, tiny defenseless human beings. Because if they admitted that, their consciences might compel them to stop--and then what would that do to that big old abortion industry ($70M in Ontario alone)?"

So no, we certainly cannot have that discussion. It's so much better for the CMA to worship at the abortion altar of "woman's rights," than to face a truth they simply cannot handle. A truth that slaps them in their conscience, and hits them in their pocket book. The truth about what an unborn child is.


  1. I have my doubts that doctors in Canada are doing this. After all, most abortions are pre-14 weeks, and are done by suction. So they only see bloody mush in the jar after the abortion. Abortions done later are usually done by induced abortion, delivering a baby that dies soon after, or delivering a baby that was killed by injection to the heart.
    So describing late term abortions like this isn't going to do much to change any Cdn doctors, when I don't think this type of procedure is done here.
    If it is being done in Canada, I think the names of clinics and hospitals should be cited, and the doctors' names should also be publicized.

  2. This Toronto abortion clinic says they use D&E for second trimester abortions:

    And BC Health says D&E is used for second trimester abortions, and describes it; but note the euphemisms to describe it:
    For example: "Pass a grasping instrument (forceps) into the uterus to grasp larger pieces of tissue. This is more likely in pregnancies of 16 weeks or more and is done before the uterine lining is scraped with a curette. Use a curved instrument (curette) to gently scrape the lining of the uterus and remove tissue in the uterus. Use suction, which may be done as a final step to make sure the uterine contents are completely removed."

    In other words, "grasp the arm and pry it off the baby's body", then "grasp a leg and yank it off the baby who, if 20 weeks, or maybe even as young as 16 weeks, is now writhing in excruciating pain."

    And this:
    "During the direct examination, you might see an arm or an umbilical cord or, even, the body. It doesn't all come out in one piece. With your imagination, you can see that it resembles a human." This second-term abortion is not an induction abortion, it's an abortion where the baby is cut up. This is barbaric. This is live babies that are pulled apart and that feel pain.

    There were 358 late term abortions done in Ontario alone in 2010:

    And remember from here on in, we won't know how many of these late-term abortions are committed and we won't know how many of them are D&Es because from now on, they can be, and will be, all done completely in secret, all publicly funded, courtesy Mr. Dalton Mcguinty.

  3. The latest stats, though woefully incomplete, still report 537 abortions AFTER 21 weeks.