Pages

Friday, December 5, 2025

Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights gets millions in funding from pro-abortion organizations

phi·lan·thro·py /fəˈlanTHrəpē/ noun the desire to promote the welfare of others, expressed especially by the generous donation of money to good causes.

Action Canada for Health and Reproductive Rights doesn't only get funding from the Canadian government (AKA you and me), they get money from lots of other places.

After researching this I was kind of dumbfounded about just how much money comes from pro-abortion/sexual reproductive rights/LGBTQ funding groups into organizations like Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights. This particular research is only focused on one such Canadian charity--Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights--and what they get. But I saw many organizations that donate millions and millions to the promotion and advocacy of the killing of pre-born children and so-called LGBTQ rights, etc. Is this really what philanthropy is all about? No wonder there are so many organizations involved in this work--there are millions and millions to be made. Action Canada is just one of the groups that benefits from this largesse of blood money.

Imagine the good that could be done if pro-life groups got similar funding?

Here is a breakdown of the dollars that went to Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights from 2015 to 2023. I don't have numbers yet for 2024.

Canadian Government

  • Indigenous services (funding in 2023)
  • Health Canada (funding in 2023, 2024)
  • Global Affairs (funding in 2023,2022, 2021, 2020)
  • Public Health Agency Canada (Funding in 2023,2022, 2021, 2020)

Beverley Chernos Fund (donated in 2023, 2021 and 2020)

This fund donates to numerous organizations, including Action Canada

Wellspring Philanthropic Fund (donated in 2022 and 2020)

"Expanding the voices, dignity and interests of the most marginalized communities, including women, children, people living in poverty, people of color, people with disabilities, LGBT people, and people affected by armed conflict and mass atrocities."

Melinda and Gates Foundation (donated in 2023, 2022 and 2021) 

Governments of the Netherlands and Denmark (one or both funded Action Canada in every year from 2023 to 2015)

Ford foundation:

"Core support for All Above All Reproductive Justice Coalition for national and state policy advocacy, civic engagement and strategic communications to increase and expand access to abortion for all women regardless of income, race, or immigration status"

New Venture Fund (donated in 2019, 2018)

United Nations Population Fund (funding in 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019)

Bentley Awards https://www.actioncanadashr.org/about/awards-and-scholarships/bentley-awards

Edmonton Community Foundation

European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights https://www.epfweb.org/node/1147 (funding in 2023) Get a load of this from their website:

"A new alliance of religious extremists, far-right populists, and oligarchic funders is reshaping European politics. The Next Wave describes this covert, strategic effort to launder religious extremism into mainstream governance through media, NGOs, political parties, and public institutions. 

Backed by private wealth and legitimised through state funding, this movement is engineering a long-term authoritarian transformation under the guise of tradition and care. This project exposes the financial, political, and ideological architecture of The Next Wave, equipping civil society to recognise, resist, and counter its growing influence. Philanthropic support is essential to disrupt this emerging infrastructure and defend pluralistic democracy."

Other Funds (funding in 2023, 2022, 2021)

Rutgers (funding in 2019)

"Rutgers is the Dutch centre of knowledge and expertise for the sexual health, safety and wellbeing. We provide reliable information, resources and support young people to make informed decisions about their bodies, lives and futures."

Bayer (Funding in 2017 and 2016)

RFSU Swedish company. (Funding in 2017)

"Five priorities: Abortion, Sex education, LGBTQI rights, Equal health and care, Democratic space and cooperation in civil society"

IPPF International Planned Parenthood Federation (funding in 2017)

Oxfam funded Action Canada on one of its contracts. It's important to note that Oxfam also receives millions and millions of dollars from the Canadian government (I mean you and me).

Anonymous (funding in 2017 and 2016)

(NOTE: These Amounts are identified in the year received, and not necessarily revenue for that year)

Dying with Dignity just can't stop lobbying government

Dying with Dignity lobbies government yet again. They don't stop to take a breath before they are back at it. Pro-death cult that they are. Lobby lobby lobby. 

Friday, November 28, 2025

Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights freaks out over Canada's late-term abortion reality

On November 25, 2025 the pro-abortion Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights (who got all antsy pantsy with Right Now's recent expose on late-term abortion in Canada) lobbied ten MPs and government officials. 

Notice they even lobbied a student. How pathetic is that?

Here is that list of those people who they lobbied:

  • Elizabeth Gichimu, Director of Operations, Office of MP Greaves | House of Commons
  • Eloise Kingdon, Student, Office of MP Greaves | House of Commons
  • Peggy Ainslie, Executive Director, SRH Fund | Health Canada (HC)
  • Francois Rivest, Manager of Partnerships and Projects | Health Canada (HC)
  • Carina Gabriele, Director of Policy | Women and Gender Equality (WAGE)
  • Anita Vandenbeld, Member of Parliament | House of Commons
  • Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe, Member of Parliament | House of Commons
  • Juanita Nathan, Member of Parliament | House of Commons
  • Marie-Gabrielle Menard , Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Women and Gender Equality and Secretary of State (Small Business and Tourism) (Parliamentary Secretary) | Women and Gender Equality (WAGE)
  • Mackenzy Metcalfe, Policy Advisor, Office of the Minister of Finance | Finance Canada (FIN)
  • Carina Gabriele, Director of Policy | Women and Gender Equality (WAGE)

I guess they thought they needed to get out there to try and counter the recent devastating story of Canada's late-term abortion reality thanks to Right Now.

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Dying with Dignity just can't lobby enough

Dying with Dignity is on a roll. They lobbied nine different bureaucrats/MPs at the end of October. This is in addition to all of their previous lobbying. Apparently it's impossible to lobby too much when it comes to killing Canadians.

  • Stan Kutcher, Senator | Senate of Canada
  • Kristina Tesser-Derksen, Member of Parliament
  • Hedy Fry, Member of Parliament
  • Julie Robinson, Legal Counsel for Constitutional Affairs and Intergovernmental Relations | Justice Canada (JC)
  • Thomas Law, Advisor, Policy and Regional Affairs (ON) | Justice Canada (JC)
  • Brendan Hanley, Member of Parliament
  • Robert Oliphant, Member of Parliament
  • Bryn Savage, Policy Advisory, Minister of Health's Office
  • Karen Kusch, Senior Policy Advisor, Health Care Programs and Policy Directorate | Health Canada (HC)
  • Kajan Ratneswaran, Manager, Health Policy Branch | Health Canada (HC)
  • Pauline Rochefort, Member of Parliament




Read it and weep.
"Follow up to the 2023 Parliamentary Review of Medical Assistance in Dying report and any legislation that arise thereto in respect of advance requests, mature minors, MAID for those whose sole underlying condition is a mental illness, the state of palliative care and the protection of Canadians living with disabilities. Conscience rights of clinicians and the need for effective referral for patients. Access of persons across Canada to lawful medical procedures that are provided for under the Canada Health Act. Regulations for the Monitoring of MAID and changes to requirements. Statistical reporting and data collection issues in relation to MAID, Tracks 1 and 2. MAID curriculum or educational initiatives. Legislation and regulation regarding alternative therapies that can be incorporated at end-of-life such as psilocybin."

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Right Now goes undercover to expose Canada's late-term abortion industry

For anyone thinking that late term abortions are not happening in Canada, think again. Right Now has gone undercover to expose the lies told by the pro-abortions. This eight minute video uncovers the truth.

Monday, November 10, 2025

Government continues funding ideological LGBTQ and Abortion pet projects

The Canadian government has spent at least $5,321,040,71 ** on all things LGBTQ and or reproductive rights funding for as long as these grants have been recorded back to 2007. You can see the progression of the funding and how the number of grants increases every year. From 2007-2014 there are only three pages of data. From 2015 to the present there is a whopping 80 pages of data. Note also that there are only two projects identified for 2026 so far (early days).

With budget 2025 this preoccupation with LGBTQ funding and or reproductive rights funding will undoubtedly grow significantly in the coming months. In this budget:
  • 'Gender' is mentioned 99 times; '2SLGBTQI+' is mentioned 19 times
  • 'Gender-Based Analysis Plus' or 'GBA' is mentioned 23 times
(** NOTE on data: I have excluded any funding amendments so as to not duplicate dollars. This means that amendments that would have increased the funding dollars may be ignored, underestimating actual spending. Also there may be a few line items that may include the word pride and might not be of the LGBTQ pride variety.)

Liberal governments are obsessed with funding gender and abortion initiatives. Not just in Canada but around the world. With a staggering projected deficit this year of over $78 billion do we really need to let Liberal ideological pet causes be funded ad nauseum?

Monday, November 3, 2025

Fighting MAID - Priests must speak out against euthanasia

With a little help from AI: which countries perform the most euthanasia per capita?

  • The jurisdictions with the highest rates of euthanasia or physician-assisted dying (MAID) per capita are Canada and the Netherlands. Specifically, the Canadian province of Quebec reports the highest regional rate globally. 
    As a percentage of total deaths:
    • Quebec, Canada: Accounted for 6.8% of total deaths in a recent reporting period (April 2022-March 2023). In 2023, MAID accounted for 4.7% of all deaths across Canada.
    • Netherlands: Euthanasia and assisted suicide cases make up approximately 4.8% to over 5% of all deaths.
    • Belgium: The rate is around 2.3% of all deaths.
    • Switzerland: Assisted suicide accounts for approximately 1.5% to 2.3% of all deaths. 

From Priests for Life recent newsletter on what we Catholics and clergy need to do to counter the euthanasia lobby:

The euthanasia forces have a very clear program. Make killing not just available but make it socially acceptable, seen as a natural alternative and morally obligatory. Once a decision is made, it must not be discussed, but just accepted and lauded. 
...

I would challenge anyone reading this newsletter to realize that we must embark on several things at the same time, difficult though they may be. Firstly, our people are being educated by their front pages and newsfeeds. They are being bombarded by the pro-euthanasia campaign. We also need an engaging campaign teaching why suicide and being killed by physicians is wrong. This must be a sustained campaign - not just for one week or year. It must reach Catholics and non-practicing Catholics. 

Secondly, we must be very clear about fighting for the conscience rights of family members who are responsible for those who are weak and vulnerable. The conscience rights of our health care workers, the social necessity of protecting the weak and the vulnerable must be protected.

Thirdly, these are life and death situations. We need to educate our own priests and deacons to be leaders in this area and to militate for their own legal protections. The pro-death campaign is well on its way in our hospitals, hospices, and nursing homes. Is the pro-life campaign really up to responding? 

Fr. Tom Lynch (PFLC National President) 
Dying with Dignity obsessively lobbies the government. They receive millions in donations every year, yet they have the nerve to get funding from the Canada Summer jobs program, a program that pro-life organizations are ineligible to receive. 

All of us, clergy included, need to speak out publicly against Canada's evil euthanasia regime.

Saturday, November 1, 2025

Focusing on only one group to revoke charitable status "dangerous precedent and unnecessary"

I received access to this ATIP to CRA - A-2023-162975: 

Records related to the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) policies and decision-making mechanisms when an organization applies for charitable tax status, and how the CRA makes decisions to conduct audits after receiving a complaint. As well all records related to the 2021 Liberal Party promise to no longer give charitable tax status to anti-abortion groups from October 29, 2022, to May 25, 2023.

It seems that a senior policy analyst had some serious concerns with the government's [read Justin Trudeau's] witch hunt against pro-life organizations, and in particular pregnancy care centres.

From: Ainslie, Camille, Senior Policy Analyst / Planning and Legislation Division / Canada Revenue Agency 

Sent: January 17, 2023 12:12PM

To: Wehbe, Suzanne

Subject: RE: 2023 Bl Report- call for topics

I believe you have extended the deadline for suggestions, but wanted to send you my thoughts so far:

How do other common law regulators of charity explain their approach to regulatory and risk framework, and what can we learn from them? [This is how I view Sharmila's question about balancing resources devoted to up front review (ADM) with downstream review (Compliance), we achieve the balance by focusing on risk]

In the era of fake news, do other common law of charity regulators (in the US, Australia, England and Wales, New Zealand), provide any guidance to charities about the regulatory consequences of circulating mis-information, and if so, what can we learn from this?

Driver: Ministerial mandate letters touch on mis-information regarding anti-abortion organizations. Given the concerns expressed by the TIWG about focusing on one type of group, perhaps we should look more generally at this issue (there are high profile media reports of other organizations spreading mis-information such as those denying the issues at residential schools, or spreading incorrect information about vaccine impacts). (emphasis added)

Identify if, and how, common law regulators of charity in other countries provide guidance to charities on how breaking the criminal law will impact charitable registration...

Then there's this repeated four times in the document:

In April 2022,TIWG, we heard from the roundtable: • There are concerns that the anti-abortion legislation targets only one type of charities [sic] for providing miss information [sic]. This is a dangerous precedent and unnecessary. The Agency already has the tools to address organizations providing miss information (emphasis added)

Government targeting just one group of charities for ideological reasons is never a good idea.

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Abortion researchers giddy about abortion dollars

UBC researchers lead national project to strengthen access to abortion care.

UBC Faculty of Medicine researchers have received more than $4.3 million from the Government of Canada to address barriers to abortion access for underserved populations.

The nerve of Dr. Wendy Norman and health minister Marjorie Michel. Look at the smiles on their faces. Smiling about getting money for research into the killing of unborn children. This is disgusting. 

And what kind of nonsense is this about there being barriers to abortion access in Canada? Canada has the most liberal abortion access in the entire world. Paid for by you and me. And now we are giving more money to this death cult. 

Mark Carney's government is clearly continuing Justin Trudeau's pathetic abortion agenda.

Friday, October 3, 2025

Fraser Health buckles to pro-abortion rhetoric

Dear Fraser Health,

I was very disappointed to learn that Fraser Health has decided not to partner with Hope for Women. I see that Joyce Arthur and other pro-abortion advocates have poisoned the well by convincing you that Pregnancy Care Centres are horrible places. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Arthur has been spreading disinformation about these centres for many years now. I have written extensively on refuting the fabrications of Arthur, probably as long as she has been spreading them.

Arthur argues that saying you can't refer someone to an abortion service “is disingenuous". Ah, no. It's because the values of these centres prohibit them from referring for abortion. In any event, women do not need a referral for abortion, they can get one whenever they want, and Arthur knows this.  

Arthur also insists on calling these centres "fake clinics", a derogatory term that actually means nothing except to Arthur. And horror of horrors, pregnancy centres use scary words like “hope”, “life” or "beginnings”. 

These centres do amazing work but have to continually put up with the myths spread by Arthur.

Women in Canada can get an abortion at any time during pregnancy, for any reason or for no reason, all paid for by the taxpayer. Abortion advocates also get millions and millions of dollars every year to ply their abortion ideology on the public. In fact just this week the federal government announced another $13 million for abortion. Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights (formerly Planned Parenthood) is the top recipient of this taxpayer largesse.

Guess how much money Pregnancy Care Centres get from the government? Zero, Zilch, Nada. No millions for them.

So dear Fraser Health, it is really too bad you will not partner with a Pregnancy Care Centre. You are missing an amazing opportunity.

Sincerely,

Patricia Maloney

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Canada pours more money into abortion

The gazillions of dollars Canada already spends on abortion isn't enough. Yesterday the government announced spending of another $13 million.

Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, Project: Access for All, Funding: $2,821,500

Birth Mark, Project: Reproductive Health Equity Project, Funding: $558,675

Canadian Association of Community Health Centres, Project: The Sexual and Reproductive Health-National Project, Funding: $339,658

Canadian Association of Science Centres, Project: Working Together Against Misinformation: Sharing Knowledge and Building Community Capacity to Address Sexual Reproductive Health Misinformation, Funding: $747,870

Canadian Paediatric Society, Project: Comprehensive sexual health care for adolescents: An online course for health care providers, Funding: $307,606

Canadian Pharmacists Association, Project: Pharmacist Toolkit Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health Care of Indigenous and Two-Spirit Patients, Funding: $403,602

Canadian Society for the Advancement of Gynaecologic Excellence Inc. (CanSAGE), Project: Strengthening Endometriosis Care Through Tailored Education: The Development and Launch of CanSAGE's Endometriosis Care Education Program, Funding: $496,738

Community-Based Research Centre, Project: Confronting HPV-related Cancer Care Challenges for 2S/LGBTQIA+ People, Funding: $535,863

DisAbled Women's Network of Canada (DAWN Canada), Project: Foundations for Sexual and Reproductive Health (The Foundations Project), Funding: $886,979

Egale Canada, Project: Intersex Person-Centered Care Learning for Health Care Professionals, Funding: $260,838

Northern Birthwork Collective under the care of MakeWay Charitable Society, Project: Abortion Support Program, Funding: $171,854

Support Network for Indigenous Women & Women of Colour (SNIWWOC), Project: Bridging Gaps in Sexual and Reproductive Health Care: A Holistic Approach for Racialized Communities, Funding: $442,713

The University of British Columbia (Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre), Project: For Youth Like Me: Sexual Health Education Tailored for Diverse 2SLGBTQ+ Youth and Parents, Funding: $451,088

The University of British Columbia (Contraception & Abortion Research Team - CART), Project: The CART Access project: Advancing access to abortion for under-served populations through tools for healthcare professionals and people seeking care, Funding: $4,387,931

Yukon Status of Women Council, Project: Connecting Data and Decisions: Improving Abortion Access in the Yukon, Funding: $332,689

Thursday, September 25, 2025

Dying with Dignity Lobbies government -- again

Helen Long continues unabatedly to lobby government for her euthanasia ideology. It just never stops.

Yesterday:

 

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Dying with Dignity -- More government lobbying

It looks like Dying with Dignity has a new consultant lobbying Health Canada on their behalf: Puneet Luthra, Company is P S Luthra Consulting Inc.

Last year DWDC spent $213,171 on consulting fees. That's pocket change for them considering their total revenue was $3,791,596 and they had $7,370,174 in long term investments. No wonder they lobby government so much.



Subject Matter Details

Dying With Dignity Canada seeks to influence the Government of Canada to allow for advance requests for medical assistance in dying (MAID) for people who have a diagnosis of a grievous and irremediable medical condition. (from the lobbyist website)

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

Dying with Dignity lobbies government all summer long

Dying with Dignity has been very busy this summer. While everyone else was on vacation, DWDC was lobbying MPs about their euthanasia ideology. 

(Reminder: lobbying for euthanasia is a very lucrative business for DWDC: donations were $3,791,596 in 2024; they had $9,231,137 in assets, of which $7,370,174 is in long term investments; their CEO earns between $200,000 and $249,999 a year. It is no wonder DWDC can lobby the government incessantly--they've got the finances to do so)

They managed to lobby all of these MPs between July 15 and August 29.

  • Kristina Tesser Derksen, Member of Parliament | House of Commons
  • Braedon Clark, Member of Parliament | House of Commons
  • Kajan Ratneswaran, Manager, Health Policy Branch | Health Canada (HC)
  • Patricia Lattanzio, Member of Parliament, PS Justice | House of Commons
  • Leslie Church, Parliamentary Secretary, Labour, for Seniors, and for Children and Youth, and to the Minister of Jobs and Families (Persons with Disabilities) | House of Commons

DWDC's two current lobbyists are: Tom Potter, Blackbird Strategies, Ltd. and CEO Helen Long.

More on Dying with Dignity and their successful euthanasia business.

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Let's pay down the debt instead

According to the Canadian Taxpayer's Federation, Canada's current debt is almost $1.3 trillion. So what does the Liberal government do today? They announce MORE spending for their LGBTQ ideology

News release

Today, the Honourable Rechie Valdez, Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Secretary of State (Small Business and Tourism), announced the achievements of the Federal 2SLGBTQI+ Action Plan, which continues to advance equality and address the challenges faced by these communities. Minister Valdez was joined by the Honourable Hedy Fry, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Centre, and Wade Chang, Member of Parliament for Burnaby Central.

The Government of Canada continues to make progress above and beyond these key initiatives:

  • 2SLGBTQI+ Entrepreneurship Program – $25 million to help 2SLGBTQI+ entrepreneurs overcome barriers to starting and growing their businesses,
  • Over 160 projects and capacity-building 2SLGBTQI+ initiatives – up to $75 million to promote inclusion and benefit everyone in Canada, and
  • Unity – a public awareness campaign designed to help Canadians actively break down stigma against 2SLGBTQI+ communities through education, reflection and practical actions.

In addition, the federal government has provided $3 million to Fierté Canada Pride – $1.5 million in 2024 and in 2025 – to support the security needs of Pride festivals. This funding from Canada’s Action Plan on Combatting Hate helps offset increasing security and insurance costs for events across the country, amid rising levels of 2SLGBTQI+ hate.

As I have written before, the Liberals have already spent millions and millions on their LGBTQ pet projects. There doesn't seem to be an end to this spending. How about we start putting these millions towards our national debt instead?

Thursday, August 21, 2025

The euthanasia lobby doesn't stop to take a breath

Dying with Dignity continues to lobby the government.














Here they are actually suggesting that you remember them in your will.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

Dying with Dignity wants you to remember them in your will

The ghouls at Dying with Dignity, not only advocate for euthanasia, but they have the gall to suggest that once you're dead, you could even include their death cult in your will. I am not kidding.

From their latest email:

...Before I close out this email, I wanted to invite you to consider how you can continue to express your values beyond your lifetime. A legacy gift to Dying With Dignity Canada can help ensure compassionate end-of-life choice and care for future generations. There is a common misconception that legacy giving requires a high level of wealth. This isn’t true! Legacy giving simply refers to arranging for a future gift through your will, life insurance policy, or registered investments. This arrangement allows your estate to receive charitable tax receipts that reduce your final tax burden and contribute more substantially than might be possible during your lifetime. To learn more about creating your legacy with DWDC, visit dyingwithdignity.ca/legacy or contact our Director of Development, Ryan Lindsay, at ryan.lindsay@dyingwithdignity.ca.

These people have no shame.

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

Action Canada for Sexual Health and Reproductive Rights spends your taxes on abortion and contraception

Action Canada for Sexual Health and Reproductive Rights most recent lobbying of the government this week.


Their revenue for year ending 2024-06-30:

Receipted donations $1,405,669.00 (13.11%)
Non-receipted donations $86,134.00 (0.80%)
Gifts from other registered charities $563,733.00 (5.26%)
Government funding $6,214,388.00 (57.96%)
All other revenue $2,452,805.00 (22.87%)

Total revenue: $10,722,729.00

Action Canada received $6,214,388 from the government in 2024. Their total salary costs were $3,268,787. If we add in professional and consulting fees of $727,931 and Education and training for staff and volunteers of $535,594, we get a total of $4,532,312. (Numbers from CRA)

We could say then, that about 73% of the government grants Action Canada for Sexual Health and Reproductive Rights receives, goes to salary costs, so these pro-deathers can then turn around and lobby the government to push for more abortion in Canada and internationally. And now they are also pushing for contraception in Canada and around the world. 

Monday, August 11, 2025

Dying with Dignity is very cozy with the Justice Department

 “...My organization [Dying with Dignity Canada] and I enjoyed a close and respectful working relationship with your predecessor (Justice Minister David Lametti] who very ably managed profoundly important changes to the Criminal Code of Canada concerning the legalization of medical assistance in dying...” Letter from CEO Helen Long to Justice Minister Arif Virani

In the above excerpt from a letter dated July 28, 2023 to Justice Minister Arif Virani, CEO Helen Long informs us that Dying with Dignity has a close and respectful working relationship with the Justice Department

This is clearly the case: between May 13, 2022 and April 19, 2024, Dying with Dignity Canada wrote a total of 14 letters and emails to David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General, to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, to Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General, and to Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions. Most of these letters were from CEO Helen Long. In late 2023, Minister Arif Virani met with Helen Long. DYDC has also met with previous ministers.

This is troubling. The very people who advocate for euthanasia—who receive millions in donations for their euthanasia advocacy ($3,791,596 in 2024); who have a whopping $9,231,137 in assets, of which $7,370,174 is apparently not needed operationally as it is stashed away in long term investments; whose CEO earns between $200,000 and $249,999 a year—these people are advising, meeting with, and cosying up to the politicians responsible for euthanasia law. Of course politicians are lobbied all the time, nothing new here. But to have such a close relationship, and to have this much influence on a law that permits the killing of the sick, the aged, the disabled, we should be deeply troubled that this “charity” has such a stranglehold on euthanasia law. 

The anti-euthanasia lobby does not have anything near this kind of financial ability to spend this much time and effort fighting against euthanasia, as Dying with Dignity has fighting for euthanasia.

Helen Long likes to finish her letters with this:

“Dying With Dignity Canada's national office is located within Treaty 13, the traditional home of the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee, and the Wendat peoples. Our presence on this land is not to be taken for granted. We are grateful for the opportunity to share, meet, collaborate, live, and work on this land. It is our responsibility, as both an organization and as individuals, to learn about the current and historical effects of settler-colonialism in Canada.”

I think it would be a good thing if Helen Long and Dying with Dignity would hand over the land they are occupying to the Mississaugas of the Credit, to the Anishnabeg, to to the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee, and to the Wendat peoples—as a good will gesture. Even better, she could hand over the $7,370,174 in long term assets. Words are cheap.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A few of Long's letters to the politicians she lobbies. The full ATIP here.

December 21, 2022

Honourable David Lametti MP, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Honourable Carolyn Bennett MP, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions

Dear Ministers Lametti and Bennett:

Last week, the Federal Government announced its intention to table legislation in the new year requesting an - as of yet - unspecified extension to the sunset clause, which governs the coming into force of the medical assistance in dying (MAID) law as it pertains to applicants with mental disorders as a sole underlying medical condition. Originally, the delay of Bill C-7 for this category of requesters was to have expired on March 17, 2023, at which point these individuals could have made an application for MAID.

Dying With Dignity Canada (DWDC) accepts the Government’s stated rationale for this postponement, namely that: “delaying eligibility for persons whose sole medical condition is a mental illness would allow more time for dissemination and uptake of key resources by the medical and nursing communities.” However, DWDC urges the Federal Government to work to ensure that this delay is as short as reasonably possible.

There is a small number of people across Canada who have been afflicted with severe mental health disorders, the irremediable character of which has resulted in longstanding suffering. They have been waiting patiently to be permitted to exercise some agency in their end-of-life treatment options. The passage of Bill C-7 brought hope to this group of severely afflicted sufferers that they might be granted equivalent autonomy, consistent with their Charter rights and protections, in applying and being assessed for MAID. A delay at this point will likely seem unjust to them as it further prolongs their wait and their suffering. We should keep in mind that only a small subset of this group will ever likely proceed with a MAID assessment, let alone be approved to receive MAID.

As you know, 65% of people across Canada, when polled, have indicated their belief that access to MAID, for those whose sole underlying medical condition is a mental disorder, ought to be allowed if they meet all other criteria and have the capacity to provide informed consent.

In closing, permit me to underscore a couple of key points which I believe that Members of the Government should keep top of mind going forward as they work with their colleagues in other parties and the Senate to advance this important piece of legislation:

> We must avoid exacerbating the dated belief that mental illness is somehow qualitatively different and less deserving of compassion than physical illness;

> Assessment by at least one assessor with expertise in the condition is an important procedural safeguard for clinicians who may be faced with a mental health MAID applicant;

> Canadian clinicians and psychiatrists demonstrate an inherent degree of instinctual caution. They have cared for patients with mental disorders in their practice and have the experience and tools to deal with the complexities and challenges arising in such cases. Clinical practice evolves overtime and the prudence, professionalism, and concurrent education of Canadian practitioners suggests a careful and rigorous approach to such cases would be the norm;

> MAID providers - nurse practitioners and physicians - have the highest possible incentive not to stray beyond the bounds of the Criminal Code or to possibly breach the laws and practice standards of their regulatory bodies in that they would be subject to criminal charges and lose their medical license;

> The existing conscience rights provision protects any health care professionals who are opposed to, or uncomfortable with, assessing for or providing MAID; and

> Evidence from overseas indicates that the number of approved mental health applicants for medical assistance in dying would likely be extremely small. 

We hope you and your ministerial colleagues with responsibilities for different aspects of the MAID law and its implementation will bear in mind these important points as you consider the length of the delay to be adopted and the attendant suffering of people across Canada.

If the sunset clause is extended, we strongly urge those tasked with reviewing the safeguards to work swiftly and compassionately to ensure autonomy for those impacted by this announcement.

Thank you, Ministers, for the work you have done to formulate a balanced and humane approach to the legal framework governing medical assistance in dying.

We hope you and your ministerial colleagues with responsibilities for different aspects of the MAID law and its implementation will bear in mind these important points as you consider the length of the delay to be adopted and the attendant suffering of people across Canada.

If the sunset clause is extended, we strongly urge those tasked with reviewing the safeguards to work swiftly and compassionately to ensure autonomy for those impacted by this announcement.

Thank you, Ministers, for the work you have done to formulate a balanced and humane approach to the legal framework governing medical assistance in dying.

Sincerely,

Helen Long CEO 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 10:07 AM

To: Virani, Arif - M.P. <Arif.Virani@parl.gc.ca>

Cc: @dyingwithdignity.ca>

Subject: Congratulations & Reconnecting

Dear Minister Virani,

Sincere congratulations on your well-deserved appointment to Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. Having enjoyed our discussions in the past, I look forward to being back in touch on the important issue of medical assistance in dying. I know you will have many priorities in the days ahead, but would appreciate the chance to re-connect as your time permits. 

I've also attached a letter of congratulations on behalf of our entire organization.

Kind regards, Helen

Helen Long (she/her)

CEO

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 28, 2023 Honorable Arif Virani

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Dear Minister Virani:

I wanted to send you a brief note congratulating you on your appointment as Canada's Minister of Justice and Attorney General. I know that your tenure as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice in the 42nd and 43rd Parliaments will have prepared you admirably for this role. I would like to take this opportunity to wish you well as you tackle the major legal and legislative issues which the Justice Department is responsible for overseeing.

My organization and I enjoyed a close and respectful working relationship with your predecessor who very ably managed profoundly important changes to the Criminal Code of Canada concerning the legalization of medical assistance in dying. I know that you also were very much involved in those discussions in the context of your membership of the Special Joint Committee on medical assistance in dying in 2021.

I would look forward to an opportunity to meet at some point in the coming months to discuss some of the remaining issues that Canadians believe need to be addressed to ensure we have an enlightened and progressive regime of end-of-life choices for all those who suffer grievously with physical or mental disorders.

I wish you all the very best, Minister, in your new role. Sincerely,

Helen Long CEO 

Saturday, July 5, 2025

MPs should respond to constituents

I just received the latest newsletter from my MP, Mona Fortier. She opens her newsletter with this: 

"with the election behind us and the swearing-in of the new government...I want to sincerely thank you for once again placing your trust in me. It's an honour to represent you, and I remain committed to serving every member of our community--no matter who you voted for...my door is always open."(emphasis added) MP Mona Fortier 

Since it's an honour for my MP to represent me, one would think that she would have the courtesy to reply to my letter -- no matter who I voted for. (I have now asked her four times for an answer. No response.)

Her newsletter contains the usual Liberal talking points about how much the government is going to do, but not a single word about where that money is going to come from to do it. 

She did have time to write the newsletter and have 14 pictures taken of herself to include in her newsletter, but not 10 minutes to answer my letter.

The role of an MP is supposedly:

"The member of parliament represents his constituency through service in the House of Commons. This does not mean, however, that he spends most of this time sitting in the House, or even that attendance there is the most important part of his work. An MP spends far more of his working life outside the House than in it … . The job is people-oriented, involving talking about and listening to ideas, proposals, and complaints, reconciling opposing viewpoints, explaining party or government policy to citizens and citizens’ views to party and government, getting action out of the government on problems of constituents, and examining how the government uses or abuses the power it exercises on behalf of the people of Canada." (Emphasis added)

Just answer my questions. It's your job to do so. Even if I didn't vote for you.

Friday, July 4, 2025

Should an MP answer a constituent's questions?

I have a serious question. How does one get their MP to answer a sincere and respectful question? I have now asked my MP Mona Fortier, two questions (letter below), four times. I have not received a response from her.

So where does Fortier's support lie on the charitable status of religious organizations? I think that as her constituent, I have a right to know. 

If my political leanings were liberal and not conservative would she answer me then? 

Dear Mona Fortier,

  • Do you support the continued recognition of religion as a basis for charitable status?
  • Will you oppose any attempt to revoke charitable status based on a faith-based organization’s religious beliefs?
Thank you. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Patricia Maloney

Monday, June 9, 2025

New data reveals Quebec's late-term live birth abortions for 2023/2024

In the past when I reported on Canada's late term live-birth abortions, Quebec's numbers were always excluded from CIHI's data. For the first time, I have now received Quebec's numbers for 2023/2024. 

I originally reported 123 abortions for 2023/2024 for Canada, and now we know that Quebec performed an additional 27 of these late term born-alive abortions for a new total of 150.

Saturday, June 7, 2025

Student Summer Jobs grants should be open to all Catholics

Dear Mark Carney,

I understand you are a Catholic. Well I have a question for you that is very important for all Catholics, and especially for student Catholics trying to get a job this summer. The Summer Jobs Program has increased the job grants this year by 6,000. This is great news. 

While CSJ was on track to create 70,000 jobs for youth this summer, Patty Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario, today announced up to 6,000 more Canada Summer Jobs opportunities. This will unlock new opportunities for Canadian youth and help our country build the strongest economy in the G7.

Since you are a practicing Catholic I'm sure you will agree with me that Catholic organizations who stand up for life issues, (because of course Catholics are pro-life) that you will change the criteria for the Summer Jobs Program to allow all Christian and Catholic groups to now be eligible for this program.

Can you please confirm for me that this will be the case?

Thank you and I look forward to hearing back from you real soon.

Sincerely,
Patricia Maloney

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Total 2023-2024 late-term born alive and stillbirth abortion numbers are up

Born alive and stillbirth late term abortions for 2023/2024. Totals for late-term born alive/stillbirth abortions combined, are more than the total for the previous year by 125. Comparison of the last five years below.

That is 642 late-term born alive abortions in just five years.

That is 5,738 late-term stillbirth abortions in just five years.


These numbers are most probably grossly underreported because CIHI only publishes numbers from nine provinces and the three territories. Noticeably absent is Quebec's numbers. I've asked CIHI why this is the case, and am waiting for a response.

'In Quebec, induced abortions during the second trimester of pregnancy result in a live birth more than one in ten times (11.2%). Of these live-born fetuses, one in ten survives more than 3 hours. These are the findings of a study published in June 2024 in the scientific journal American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (AJOG).  
The study was based on all second trimester abortions (13,777) performed in the hospitals of Quebec between 1989 and 2021. In Quebec, the law does not stipulate a maximum time limit for performing an abortion. The researchers found that abortions performed during the second trimester of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies doubled between the period 1989 - 2000 and 2011-2021. At the same time, they observed a significant increase in live births following a second-trimester abortion: the rate of 4.1 live births per 100 abortions in 1989-2001 climbs to 20.8% for the 2011-2021 period.

This is particularly true for abortions between 20 and 24 weeks of amenorrhea (18-22 weeks of pregnancy): in this case, more than one fetus in five is alive at the time of expulsion (21.7%).'

The pro-abortions always like to say that these late-term abortions are always done because of fetal anomalies or the health of the mother. But in 48% of these cases, the Quebec abortions took place for "personal or unspecified reasons" on a healthy fetus:

'The study showed that in 48% of second trimester abortions in Quebec, i.e. almost half the cases, there was no medical indication on the fetal side, nor any medical emergency on the maternal side. In these cases, the abortion took place for “personal or unspecified” reasons, on a healthy fetus.'

So many lies. 

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Canada's 2023 abortion numbers increase - again

Once again Canada's abortion numbers are up for 2023. I've included 2022 and 2021 below for comparison purposes. Lots of caveats emphasized below in bold. So as usual, the numbers are underreported. 

As well we used to get gestational ages of abortions. Not anymore. CIHI stopped reporting them in 2021.

2023 total abortions = 101,553

2022 total abortions = 97,211

2021 total abortions = 87,485

So Mr. Mark Carney, how do you reconcile the slaughter of 101,553 children in the womb and your Catholic faith? I'm having a wee bit of a problem with that Mr. Carney.

(PS, I couldn't find Mark Carney's email address. He's our Prime Minister but there doesn't seem to be an email address for him posted. Why is that?)







n/a: Not applicable because data from other non-hospital settings is not available.Table 1 Number of induced abortions reported in Canada in 2023, by province/territory of hospital or other non-hospital setting*Induced abortion is defined as the medical termination of pregnancy. Equivalent terms include artificial abortion, therapeutic abortion, voluntary termination of pregnancy, elective termination of pregnancy and active termination of pregnancy.† The methodology to report induced abortion volumes is consistent with the enhanced methodology that was introduced in the 2021 report. For 5 provinces — Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba and British Columbia — total induced abortion volumes were derived by using the total abortion volumes reported to the National Physician Database (NPDB) at CIHI. Volumes for non-hospital settings (e.g., clinics, physician offices) were estimated using the total abortion volumes as described above and subtracting hospital-based abortions (as reported to the Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System [NACRS]). This estimation approach for non-hospital volumes was required because information on the location where the service is rendered (e.g., clinic, hospital, physician’s office) may not be included in the NPDB data.Table 1 includes induced abortions performed in a hospital or in a non-hospital setting in Canada (numbers are presented by the province/territory in which the abortion was performed). For Quebec, induced abortions with an unknown location or cases outside of Quebec (0.1% of Quebec cases) are grouped under “non-hospital setting.” Induced abortions are not performed in clinics in Nova Scotia, the Yukon, the Northwest Territories or Nunavut; clinic volumes for Prince Edward Island are reported together with hospital-based abortions.

Hospitals are mandated by their provincial/territorial ministry of health to report all hospital activity (not limited to abortions); therefore, coverage of abortions performed in Canadian hospitals can be considered complete. However, there is no such legislative requirement for clinics providing abortion services to report their activity (reporting is voluntary). Physician billing data captures clinical activity for publicly insured medical services funded through the provincial/territorial medical care plans. For 2023, clinic data for New Brunswick and Saskatchewan is incomplete. For Quebec’s hospital and non-hospital data, only induced abortions covered by the provincial health insurance plan are included. Hospital data from all other provinces/territories includes all induced abortions performed within their respective jurisdictions. For example, patients with coverage under Quebec’s health insurance plan receiving care in Alberta are reported by Alberta. However, patients with coverage under Alberta’s health insurance plan receiving care in Quebec are not reported (by either Quebec or Alberta).

As a result of the implementation of a new province-wide electronic health record system in Alberta (i.e., Connect Care), the regular data flows for day surgery, clinic, diagnostic imaging and other ambulatory care (excluding emergency department) data to NACRS have been disrupted, resulting in a decrease in overall volumes. Caution is warranted when interpreting the percentage change in volume.